LGJul 24, 2023
Learning Resource Allocation Policy: Vertex-GNN or Edge-GNN?Yao Peng, Jia Guo, Chenyang Yang
Graph neural networks (GNNs) update the hidden representations of vertices (called Vertex-GNNs) or hidden representations of edges (called Edge-GNNs) by processing and pooling the information of neighboring vertices and edges and combining to exploit topology information. When learning resource allocation policies, GNNs cannot perform well if their expressive power is weak, i.e., if they cannot differentiate all input features such as channel matrices. In this paper, we analyze the expressive power of the Vertex-GNNs and Edge-GNNs for learning three representative wireless policies: link scheduling, power control, and precoding policies. We find that the expressive power of the GNNs depends on the linearity and output dimensions of the processing and combination functions. When linear processors are used, the Vertex-GNNs cannot differentiate all channel matrices due to the loss of channel information, while the Edge-GNNs can. When learning the precoding policy, even the Vertex-GNNs with non-linear processors may not be with strong expressive ability due to the dimension compression. We proceed to provide necessary conditions for the GNNs to well learn the precoding policy. Simulation results validate the analyses and show that the Edge-GNNs can achieve the same performance as the Vertex-GNNs with much lower training and inference time.
CVAug 30, 2019
Multi-Temporal Aerial Image Registration Using Semantic FeaturesAnanya Gupta, Yao Peng, Simon Watson et al.
A semantic feature extraction method for multitemporal high resolution aerial image registration is proposed in this paper. These features encode properties or information about temporally invariant objects such as roads and help deal with issues such as changing foliage in image registration, which classical handcrafted features are unable to address. These features are extracted from a semantic segmentation network and have shown good robustness and accuracy in registering aerial images across years and seasons in the experiments.
CVApr 17, 2019
Question Guided Modular Routing Networks for Visual Question AnsweringYanze Wu, Qiang Sun, Jianqi Ma et al.
This paper studies the task of Visual Question Answering (VQA), which is topical in Multimedia community recently. Particularly, we explore two critical research problems existed in VQA: (1) efficiently fusing the visual and textual modalities; (2) enabling the visual reasoning ability of VQA models in answering complex questions. To address these challenging problems, a novel Question Guided Modular Routing Networks (QGMRN) has been proposed in this paper. Particularly, The QGMRN is composed of visual, textual and routing network. The visual and textual network serve as the backbones for the generic feature extractors of visual and textual modalities. QGMRN can fuse the visual and textual modalities at multiple semantic levels. Typically, the visual reasoning is facilitated by the routing network in a discrete and stochastic way by using Gumbel-Softmax trick for module selection. When the input reaches a certain modular layer, routing network newly proposed in this paper, dynamically selects a portion of modules from that layer to process the input depending on the question features generated by the textual network. It can also learn to reason by routing between the generic modules without additional supervision information or expert knowledge. Benefiting from the dynamic routing mechanism, QGMRN can outperform the previous classical VQA methods by a large margin and achieve the competitive results against the state-of-the-art methods. Furthermore, attention mechanism is integrated into our QGMRN model and thus can further boost the model performance. Empirically, extensive experiments on the CLEVR and CLEVR-Humans datasets validate the effectiveness of our proposed model, and the state-of-the-art performance has been achieved.
CVFeb 4, 2019
Dual Path Multi-Scale Fusion Networks with Attention for Crowd CountingLiang Zhu, Zhijian Zhao, Chao Lu et al.
The task of crowd counting in varying density scenes is an extremely difficult challenge due to large scale variations. In this paper, we propose a novel dual path multi-scale fusion network architecture with attention mechanism named SFANet that can perform accurate count estimation as well as present high-resolution density maps for highly congested crowd scenes. The proposed SFANet contains two main components: a VGG backbone convolutional neural network (CNN) as the front-end feature map extractor and a dual path multi-scale fusion networks as the back-end to generate density map. These dual path multi-scale fusion networks have the same structure, one path is responsible for generating attention map by highlighting crowd regions in images, the other path is responsible for fusing multi-scale features as well as attention map to generate the final high-quality high-resolution density maps. SFANet can be easily trained in an end-to-end way by dual path joint training. We have evaluated our method on four crowd counting datasets (ShanghaiTech, UCF CC 50, UCSD and UCF-QRNF). The results demonstrate that with attention mechanism and multi-scale feature fusion, the proposed SFANet achieves the best performance on all these datasets and generates better quality density maps compared with other state-of-the-art approaches.
CVJun 12, 2018
Qiniu Submission to ActivityNet Challenge 2018Xiaoteng Zhang, Yixin Bao, Feiyun Zhang et al.
In this paper, we introduce our submissions for the tasks of trimmed activity recognition (Kinetics) and trimmed event recognition (Moments in Time) for Activitynet Challenge 2018. In the two tasks, non-local neural networks and temporal segment networks are implemented as our base models. Multi-modal cues such as RGB image, optical flow and acoustic signal have also been used in our method. We also propose new non-local-based models for further improvement on the recognition accuracy. The final submissions after ensembling the models achieve 83.5% top-1 accuracy and 96.8% top-5 accuracy on the Kinetics validation set, 35.81% top-1 accuracy and 62.59% top-5 accuracy on the MIT validation set.