Adam W. Hall

Adam W. Hall, Melissa Greeff, Angela P. Schoellig · utoronto

Learning-based optimal control algorithms control unknown systems using past trajectory data and a learned model of the system dynamics. These controllers use either a linear approximation of the learned dynamics, trading performance for faster computation, or nonlinear optimization methods, which typically perform better but can limit real-time applicability. In this work, we present a novel nonlinear controller that exploits differential flatness to achieve similar performance to state-of-the-art learning-based controllers but with significantly less computational effort. Differential flatness is a property of dynamical systems whereby nonlinear systems can be exactly linearized through a nonlinear input mapping. Here, the nonlinear transformation is learned as a Gaussian process and is used in a safety filter that guarantees, with high probability, stability as well as input and flat state constraint satisfaction. This safety filter is then used to refine inputs from a flat model predictive controller to perform constrained nonlinear learning-based optimal control through two successive convex optimizations. We compare our method to state-of-the-art learning-based control strategies and achieve similar performance, but with significantly better computational efficiency, while also respecting flat state and input constraints, and guaranteeing stability.

Zhaocong Yuan, Adam W. Hall, Siqi Zhou et al.

In recent years, both reinforcement learning and learning-based control -- as well as the study of their safety, which is crucial for deployment in real-world robots -- have gained significant traction. However, to adequately gauge the progress and applicability of new results, we need the tools to equitably compare the approaches proposed by the controls and reinforcement learning communities. Here, we propose a new open-source benchmark suite, called safe-control-gym, supporting both model-based and data-based control techniques. We provide implementations for three dynamic systems -- the cart-pole, the 1D, and 2D quadrotor -- and two control tasks -- stabilization and trajectory tracking. We propose to extend OpenAI's Gym API -- the de facto standard in reinforcement learning research -- with (i) the ability to specify (and query) symbolic dynamics and (ii) constraints, and (iii) (repeatably) inject simulated disturbances in the control inputs, state measurements, and inertial properties. To demonstrate our proposal and in an attempt to bring research communities closer together, we show how to use safe-control-gym to quantitatively compare the control performance, data efficiency, and safety of multiple approaches from the fields of traditional control, learning-based control, and reinforcement learning.

Tobias A. Farger, Adam W. Hall, Angela P. Schoellig

Learning-based control techniques use data from past trajectories to control systems with uncertain dynamics. However, learning-based controllers are often computationally inefficient, limiting their practicality. To address this limitation, we propose a learning-based controller that exploits differential flatness, a property of many robotic systems. Recent research on using flatness for learning-based control either is limited in that it (i) ignores input constraints, (ii) applies only to single-input systems, or (iii) is tailored to specific platforms. In contrast, our approach uses a system extension and block-diagonal cost formulation to control general multi-input, nonlinear, affine systems. Furthermore, it satisfies input and half-space flat state constraints and guarantees probabilistic Lyapunov decrease using only two sequential convex optimizations. We show that our approach performs similarly to, but is multiple times more efficient than, a Gaussian process model predictive controller in simulation, and achieves competitive tracking in real hardware experiments.

Filip Marić, Matthew Giamou, Adam W. Hall et al.

Solving the inverse kinematics problem is a fundamental challenge in motion planning, control, and calibration for articulated robots. Kinematic models for these robots are typically parametrized by joint angles, generating a complicated mapping between the robot configuration and the end-effector pose. Alternatively, the kinematic model and task constraints can be represented using invariant distances between points attached to the robot. In this paper, we formalize the equivalence of distance-based inverse kinematics and the distance geometry problem for a large class of articulated robots and task constraints. Unlike previous approaches, we use the connection between distance geometry and low-rank matrix completion to find inverse kinematics solutions by completing a partial Euclidean distance matrix through local optimization. Furthermore, we parametrize the space of Euclidean distance matrices with the Riemannian manifold of fixed-rank Gram matrices, allowing us to leverage a variety of mature Riemannian optimization methods. Finally, we show that bound smoothing can be used to generate informed initializations without significant computational overhead, improving convergence. We demonstrate that our inverse kinematics solver achieves higher success rates than traditional techniques, and substantially outperforms them on problems that involve many workspace constraints.

Lukas Brunke, Melissa Greeff, Adam W. Hall et al.

The last half-decade has seen a steep rise in the number of contributions on safe learning methods for real-world robotic deployments from both the control and reinforcement learning communities. This article provides a concise but holistic review of the recent advances made in using machine learning to achieve safe decision making under uncertainties, with a focus on unifying the language and frameworks used in control theory and reinforcement learning research. Our review includes: learning-based control approaches that safely improve performance by learning the uncertain dynamics, reinforcement learning approaches that encourage safety or robustness, and methods that can formally certify the safety of a learned control policy. As data- and learning-based robot control methods continue to gain traction, researchers must understand when and how to best leverage them in real-world scenarios where safety is imperative, such as when operating in close proximity to humans. We highlight some of the open challenges that will drive the field of robot learning in the coming years, and emphasize the need for realistic physics-based benchmarks to facilitate fair comparisons between control and reinforcement learning approaches.