Berkay Turan

Spencer Hutchinson, Berkay Turan, Mahnoosh Alizadeh

The safe linear bandit problem is a version of the classical stochastic linear bandit problem where the learner's actions must satisfy an uncertain constraint at all rounds. Due its applicability to many real-world settings, this problem has received considerable attention in recent years. By leveraging a novel approach that we call directional optimism, we find that it is possible to achieve improved regret guarantees for both well-separated problem instances and action sets that are finite star convex sets. Furthermore, we propose a novel algorithm for this setting that improves on existing algorithms in terms of empirical performance, while enjoying matching regret guarantees. Lastly, we introduce a generalization of the safe linear bandit setting where the constraints are convex and adapt our algorithms and analyses to this setting by leveraging a novel convex-analysis based approach.

Spencer Hutchinson, Berkay Turan, Mahnoosh Alizadeh

We consider a safe optimization problem with bandit feedback in which an agent sequentially chooses actions and observes responses from the environment, with the goal of maximizing an arbitrary function of the response while respecting stage-wise constraints. We propose an algorithm for this problem, and study how the geometric properties of the constraint set impact the regret of the algorithm. In order to do so, we introduce the notion of the sharpness of a particular constraint set, which characterizes the difficulty of performing learning within the constraint set in an uncertain setting. This concept of sharpness allows us to identify the class of constraint sets for which the proposed algorithm is guaranteed to enjoy sublinear regret. Simulation results for this algorithm support the sublinear regret bound and provide empirical evidence that the sharpness of the constraint set impacts the performance of the algorithm.

Berkay Turan, Cesar A. Uribe, Hoi-To Wai et al.

In this paper, we propose a first-order distributed optimization algorithm that is provably robust to Byzantine failures-arbitrary and potentially adversarial behavior, where all the participating agents are prone to failure. We model each agent's state over time as a two-state Markov chain that indicates Byzantine or trustworthy behaviors at different time instants. We set no restrictions on the maximum number of Byzantine agents at any given time. We design our method based on three layers of defense: 1) temporal robust aggregation, 2) spatial robust aggregation, and 3) gradient normalization. We study two settings for stochastic optimization, namely Sample Average Approximation and Stochastic Approximation. We provide convergence guarantees of our method for strongly convex and smooth non-convex cost functions.

Ahmadreza Moradipari, Berkay Turan, Yasin Abbasi-Yadkori et al.

We study two model selection settings in stochastic linear bandits (LB). In the first setting, which we refer to as feature selection, the expected reward of the LB problem is in the linear span of at least one of $M$ feature maps (models). In the second setting, the reward parameter of the LB problem is arbitrarily selected from $M$ models represented as (possibly) overlapping balls in $\mathbb R^d$. However, the agent only has access to misspecified models, i.e.,~estimates of the centers and radii of the balls. We refer to this setting as parameter selection. For each setting, we develop and analyze a computationally efficient algorithm that is based on a reduction from bandits to full-information problems. This allows us to obtain regret bounds that are not worse (up to a $\sqrt{\log M}$ factor) than the case where the true model is known. This is the best-reported dependence on the number of models $M$ in these settings. Finally, we empirically show the effectiveness of our algorithms using synthetic and real-world experiments.