93.7CLApr 9
EXAONE 4.5 Technical ReportEunbi Choi, Kibong Choi, Sehyun Chun et al.
This technical report introduces EXAONE 4.5, the first open-weight vision language model released by LG AI Research. EXAONE 4.5 is architected by integrating a dedicated visual encoder into the existing EXAONE 4.0 framework, enabling native multimodal pretraining over both visual and textual modalities. The model is trained on large-scale data with careful curation, particularly emphasizing document-centric corpora that align with LG's strategic application domains. This targeted data design enables substantial performance gains in document understanding and related tasks, while also delivering broad improvements across general language capabilities. EXAONE 4.5 extends context length up to 256K tokens, facilitating long-context reasoning and enterprise-scale use cases. Comparative evaluations demonstrate that EXAONE 4.5 achieves competitive performance in general benchmarks while outperforming state-of-the-art models of similar scale in document understanding and Korean contextual reasoning. As part of LG's ongoing effort toward practical industrial deployment, EXAONE 4.5 is designed to be continuously extended with additional domains and application scenarios to advance AI for a better life.
EPAug 28, 2023
Comparison of automated crater catalogs for Mars from Benedix et al. (2020) and Lee and Hogan (2021)Christopher Lee
Crater mapping using neural networks and other automated methods has increased recently with automated Crater Detection Algorithms (CDAs) applied to planetary bodies throughout the solar system. A recent publication by Benedix et al. (2020) showed high performance at small scales compared to similar automated CDAs but with a net positive diameter bias in many crater candidates. I compare the publicly available catalogs from Benedix et al. (2020) and Lee & Hogan (2021) and show that the reported performance is sensitive to the metrics used to test the catalogs. I show how the more permissive comparison methods indicate a higher CDA performance by allowing worse candidate craters to match ground-truth craters. I show that the Benedix et al. (2020) catalog has a substantial performance loss with increasing latitude and identify an image projection issue that might cause this loss. Finally, I suggest future applications of neural networks in generating large scientific datasets be validated using secondary networks with independent data sources or training methods.
EPOct 23, 2020
Automated crater detection with human level performanceChristopher Lee, James Hogan
Crater cataloging is an important yet time-consuming part of geological mapping. We present an automated Crater Detection Algorithm (CDA) that is competitive with expert-human researchers and hundreds of times faster. The CDA uses multiple neural networks to process digital terrain model and thermal infra-red imagery to identify and locate craters across the surface of Mars. We use additional post-processing filters to refine and remove potential false crater detections, improving our precision and recall by 10% compared to Lee (2019). We now find 80% of known craters above 3km in diameter, and identify 7,000 potentially new craters (13% of the identified craters). The median differences between our catalog and other independent catalogs is 2-4% in location and diameter, in-line with other inter-catalog comparisons. The CDA has been used to process global terrain maps and infra-red imagery for Mars, and the software and generated global catalog are available at https://doi.org/10.5683/SP2/CFUNII.