Sharath Koorathota

Sharath Koorathota, Nikolas Papadopoulos, Jia Li Ma et al.

Vision Transformers (ViT) have advanced computer vision, yet their efficacy in complex tasks like driving remains less explored. This study enhances ViT by integrating human eye gaze, captured via eye-tracking, to increase prediction accuracy in driving scenarios under uncertainty in both real-world and virtual reality scenarios. First, we establish the significance of human eye gaze in left-right driving decisions, as observed in both human subjects and a ViT model. By comparing the similarity between human fixation maps and ViT attention weights, we reveal the dynamics of overlap across individual heads and layers. This overlap demonstrates that fixation data can guide the model in distributing its attention weights more effectively. We introduce the fixation-attention intersection (FAX) loss, a novel loss function that significantly improves ViT performance under high uncertainty conditions. Our results show that ViT, when trained with FAX loss, aligns its attention with human gaze patterns. This gaze-informed approach has significant potential for driver behavior analysis, as well as broader applications in human-centered AI systems, extending ViT's use to complex visual environments.

Sharath Koorathota, Arunesh Mittal, Richard P. Sloan et al.

Cognition in midlife is an important predictor of age-related mental decline and statistical models that predict cognitive performance can be useful for predicting decline. However, existing models struggle to capture complex relationships between physical, sociodemographic, psychological and mental health factors that effect cognition. Using data from an observational, cohort study, Midlife in the United States (MIDUS), we modeled a large number of variables to predict executive function and episodic memory measures. We used cross-sectional and longitudinal outcomes with varying sparsity, or amount of missing data. Deep neural network (DNN) models consistently ranked highest in all of the cognitive performance prediction tasks, as assessed with root mean squared error (RMSE) on out-of-sample data. RMSE differences between DNN and other model types were statistically significant (T(8) = -3.70; p < 0.05). The interaction effect between model type and sparsity was significant (F(9)=59.20; p < 0.01), indicating the success of DNNs can partly be attributed to their robustness and ability to model hierarchical relationships between health-related factors. Our findings underscore the potential of neural networks to model clinical datasets and allow better understanding of factors that lead to cognitive decline.