Kalle G. Timperi

Basak Sakcak, Kalle G. Timperi, Vadim Weinstein et al.

This paper addresses the lower limits of encoding and processing the information acquired through interactions between an internal system (robot algorithms or software) and an external system (robot body and its environment) in terms of action and observation histories. Both are modeled as transition systems. We want to know the weakest internal system that is sufficient for achieving passive (filtering) and active (planning) tasks. We introduce the notion of an information transition system for the internal system which is a transition system over a space of information states that reflect a robot's or other observer's perspective based on limited sensing, memory, computation, and actuation. An information transition system is viewed as a filter and a policy or plan is viewed as a function that labels the states of this information transition system. Regardless of whether internal systems are obtained by learning algorithms, planning algorithms, or human insight, we want to know the limits of feasibility for given robot hardware and tasks. We establish, in a general setting, that minimal information transition systems exist up to reasonable equivalence assumptions, and are unique under some general conditions. We then apply the theory to generate new insights into several problems, including optimal sensor fusion/filtering, solving basic planning tasks, and finding minimal representations for modeling a system given input-output relations.

Filip V. Georgiev, Kalle G. Timperi, Başak Sakçak et al.

This paper bridges some of the gap between optimal planning and reinforcement learning (RL), both of which share roots in dynamic programming applied to sequential decision making or optimal control. Whereas planning typically favors deterministic models, goal termination, and cost minimization, RL tends to favor stochastic models, infinite-horizon discounting, and reward maximization in addition to learning-related parameters such as the learning rate and greediness factor. A derandomized version of RL is developed, analyzed, and implemented to yield performance comparisons with value iteration and Dijkstra's algorithm using simple planning models. Next, mathematical analysis shows: 1) conditions under which cost minimization and reward maximization are equivalent, 2) conditions for equivalence of single-shot goal termination and infinite-horizon episodic learning, and 3) conditions under which discounting causes goal achievement to fail. The paper then advocates for defining and optimizing truecost, rather than inserting arbitrary parameters to guide operations. Performance studies are then extended to the stochastic case, using planning-oriented criteria and comparing value iteration to RL with learning rates and greediness factors.