Jialin Guo

Jialin Guo, Zhenyu Wu, Zhiqiang Zhan et al.

The calibration for deep neural networks is currently receiving widespread attention and research. Miscalibration usually leads to overconfidence of the model. While, under the condition of long-tailed distribution of data, the problem of miscalibration is more prominent due to the different confidence levels of samples in minority and majority categories, and it will result in more serious overconfidence. To address this problem, some current research have designed diverse temperature coefficients for different categories based on temperature scaling (TS) method. However, in the case of rare samples in minority classes, the temperature coefficient is not generalizable, and there is a large difference between the temperature coefficients of the training set and the validation set. To solve this challenge, this paper proposes a dual-branch temperature scaling calibration model (Dual-TS), which considers the diversities in temperature parameters of different categories and the non-generalizability of temperature parameters for rare samples in minority classes simultaneously. Moreover, we noticed that the traditional calibration evaluation metric, Excepted Calibration Error (ECE), gives a higher weight to low-confidence samples in the minority classes, which leads to inaccurate evaluation of model calibration. Therefore, we also propose Equal Sample Bin Excepted Calibration Error (Esbin-ECE) as a new calibration evaluation metric. Through experiments, we demonstrate that our model yields state-of-the-art in both traditional ECE and Esbin-ECE metrics.

Jipeng Tan, Weifeng Zhang, Ye Wu et al.

Recommendation algorithms have become the dominant mechanism for information distribution on digital platforms, profoundly shaping personalized information consumption environments. However, gender bias, as a significant form of algorithmic discrimination, may cause users to experience unequal exposure within different political information environments. Taking YouTube as a case, we conduct a controlled social-bot field experiment, where male-coded and female-coded profiles are constructed. We track the exposure and click patterns of these bots to analyze their recommendation trajectories. We analyze the distribution of recommended content from two dimensions: allocative bias and structural bias. First, we find statistically significant differences in allocative bias across male-coded and female-coded profiles, particularly in terms of issue distribution, ideological orientation, and political entities. Secondly, we observe structural bias in the political information environments, characterized by distinct clustering patterns. Additionally, time-series analysis shows that exposure pathways continue to be shaped over time by both communities detected in the co-occurrence network and individual profile-level dynamics. Finally, we construct a simple collaborative-filtering model that reproduces the observed gender bias. We argue that gender bias in recommendation systems is reflected not only in the allocation of political content, but also in how community structures shape these environments, reinforcing societal inequalities and highlighting the need for algorithmic fairness.