CYAug 11, 2023
FUTURE-AI: International consensus guideline for trustworthy and deployable artificial intelligence in healthcareKarim Lekadir, Aasa Feragen, Abdul Joseph Fofanah et al. · eth-zurich
Despite major advances in artificial intelligence (AI) for medicine and healthcare, the deployment and adoption of AI technologies remain limited in real-world clinical practice. In recent years, concerns have been raised about the technical, clinical, ethical and legal risks associated with medical AI. To increase real world adoption, it is essential that medical AI tools are trusted and accepted by patients, clinicians, health organisations and authorities. This work describes the FUTURE-AI guideline as the first international consensus framework for guiding the development and deployment of trustworthy AI tools in healthcare. The FUTURE-AI consortium was founded in 2021 and currently comprises 118 inter-disciplinary experts from 51 countries representing all continents, including AI scientists, clinicians, ethicists, and social scientists. Over a two-year period, the consortium defined guiding principles and best practices for trustworthy AI through an iterative process comprising an in-depth literature review, a modified Delphi survey, and online consensus meetings. The FUTURE-AI framework was established based on 6 guiding principles for trustworthy AI in healthcare, i.e. Fairness, Universality, Traceability, Usability, Robustness and Explainability. Through consensus, a set of 28 best practices were defined, addressing technical, clinical, legal and socio-ethical dimensions. The recommendations cover the entire lifecycle of medical AI, from design, development and validation to regulation, deployment, and monitoring. FUTURE-AI is a risk-informed, assumption-free guideline which provides a structured approach for constructing medical AI tools that will be trusted, deployed and adopted in real-world practice. Researchers are encouraged to take the recommendations into account in proof-of-concept stages to facilitate future translation towards clinical practice of medical AI.
7.9CVMay 14
Automatic Landmark-Based Segmentation of Human Subcortical Structures in MRIAhmed Rekik, R. Jarrett Rushmore, Sylvain Bouix et al.
Precise segmentation of brain structures in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is essential for reliable neuroimaging analysis, yet voxel-wise deep models often yield anatomically inconsistent results that diverge from expert-defined boundaries. In this research, we propose a landmark-guided 3D brain segmentation approach that explicitly mimics the manual segmentation protocol of the Harvard--Oxford Atlas. A Global-to-Local network automatically detects 16 landmarks representing key subcortical reference points. Then, a semantic segmentation model produces a coarse segmentation of 12 anatomical labels, each grouping multiple subcortical regions. Finally, a landmark-driven post-processing step separates these 12 labels into 26 distinct structures by enforcing local anatomical constraints. Experimental results demonstrate consistent improvements in boundary accuracy. Overall, integrating learned landmarks aligns segmentations more closely with manual protocols.
CVMay 9, 2016
Robust imaging of hippocampal inner structure at 7T: in vivo acquisition protocol and methodological choicesLinda Marrakchi-Kacem, Alexandre Vignaud, Julien Sein et al.
OBJECTIVE:Motion-robust multi-slab imaging of hippocampal inner structure in vivo at 7T.MATERIALS AND METHODS:Motion is a crucial issue for ultra-high resolution imaging, such as can be achieved with 7T MRI. An acquisition protocol was designed for imaging hippocampal inner structure at 7T. It relies on a compromise between anatomical details visibility and robustness to motion. In order to reduce acquisition time and motion artifacts, the full slab covering the hippocampus was split into separate slabs with lower acquisition time. A robust registration approach was implemented to combine the acquired slabs within a final 3D-consistent high-resolution slab covering the whole hippocampus. Evaluation was performed on 50 subjects overall, made of three groups of subjects acquired using three acquisition settings; it focused on three issues: visibility of hippocampal inner structure, robustness to motion artifacts and registration procedure performance.RESULTS:Overall, T2-weighted acquisitions with interleaved slabs proved robust. Multi-slab registration yielded high quality datasets in 96 % of the subjects, thus compatible with further analyses of hippocampal inner structure.CONCLUSION:Multi-slab acquisition and registration setting is efficient for reducing acquisition time and consequently motion artifacts for ultra-high resolution imaging of the inner structure of the hippocampus.