Irdin Pekaric

Irdin Pekaric, Michael Felderer, Philipp Steinmüller

The identification of vulnerabilities is a continuous challenge in software projects. This is due to the evolution of methods that attackers employ as well as the constant updates to the software, which reveal additional issues. As a result, new and innovative approaches for the identification of vulnerable software are needed. In this paper, we present VULNERLIZER, which is a novel framework for cross-analysis between vulnerabilities and software libraries. It uses CVE and software library data together with clustering algorithms to generate links between vulnerabilities and libraries. In addition, the training of the model is conducted in order to reevaluate the generated associations. This is achieved by updating the assigned weights. Finally, the approach is then evaluated by making the predictions using the CVE data from the test set. The results show that the VULNERLIZER has a great potential in being able to predict future vulnerable libraries based on an initial input CVE entry or a software library. The trained model reaches a prediction accuracy of 75% or higher.

Jessica Moosmann, Irdin Pekaric, Giovanni Apruzzese

Security Operations Centers (SOCs) are pivotal in modern enterprises. Tasked to monitor complex network environments constantly under attack, SOCs can be active 24/7 and can include hundreds of operators supported by state-of-the-art technologies. Abundant research has studied the internal processes of SOCs, highlighting their pros and cons, as well as the challenges faced by SOC analysts -- such as dealing with the overwhelming number of false alarms triggered by automated security mechanisms. In this context, we wonder: given that "someone" must triage the alarms, and that such triaging must be grounded on established knowledge or evidence-based reasoning, can SOC employees justify why a certain decision was taken while triaging alarms? Answering such a research question (RQ) can better guide future efforts. We hence tackle this RQs. First, via a systematic literature review across 257 research documents, we provide evidence that such RQ received limited attention so far. Then, we partner-up with a real-world SOC and carry out a field study (n=12) with SOC employees. We show them real alarms raised in their SOC, and inquire whether such alarms are indicative of true security problems or not. Then, we ask to explain their decision. We found that while most analysts were able to separate "true from false" alarms (the decision was correct in 83% of the cases), a correct justification was hardly provided (only 39% of the provided explanations reflected the actual root cause). Ultimately, our results highlight the need for decision-support systems that help SOC analysts not only make the right call -- but also understand and articulate why it is right.

Jonas Ave, Irdin Pekaric, Matthias Frohner et al.

Toxicity and harassment are widespread in the video-gaming context. Especially in competitive online multiplayer scenarios, gamers oftentimes send harmful messages to other players (teammates or opponents) whose consequences span from mild annoyance to withdrawal and depression. Abundant prior work tackled these problems, e.g., pointing out the negative effects of toxic interactions. However, few works proposed countermeasures specifically developed and tested on textual messages sent during a match -- i.e., when the "harassment" actually occurs. We posit that such a scarcity stems from the lack of high-quality datasets that can be used to devise "automated" detectors based on natural-language processing (NLP) and machine learning (ML), and which can -- ideally -- mitigate the harm of toxic comments during a gaming session. This work provides a foundation for addressing the problem of toxicity and harassment in video games. First, through a systematic literature review (n=1,039), we provide evidence that only few works proposed ML/NLP-based detectors of toxicity/harassment during live matches. Then, we partner-up with 8 expert League of Legend (LoL) players and create a fine-grained labelled dataset, L2DTnH, containing 1.4k toxic and 13.8k non-toxic messages exchanged during LoL matches. We use L2DTnH to develop a detector that we then empirically show outperforms general-purpose and state-of-the-art toxicity detectors reliant on NLP. To further demonstrate the practicality of our resources, we test our detector on game-related data beyond that included in L2DTnH; and we develop a Web-browser extension that flags toxic content in Webpages -- without querying third-party servers owned by AI companies. We publicly release all of our resources. Our contributions pave the way for more applied research devoted to fighting the spread of toxicity and harassment in video games.

Emir Karaosman, Advije Rizvani, Irdin Pekaric

Financial institutions face increasing cyber risk while operating under strict regulatory oversight. To manage this risk, they rely heavily on Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) to inform detection, response, and strategic security decisions. Artificial intelligence (AI) is widely suggested as a means to strengthen CTI. However, evidence of trustworthy production use in finance remains limited. Adoption depends not only on predictive performance, but also on governance, integration into security workflows and analyst trust. Thus, we examine how AI is used for CTI in practice within financial institutions and what barriers prevent trustworthy deployment. We report a mixed-methods, user-centric study combining a CTI-finance-focused systematic literature review, semi-structured interviews, and an exploratory survey. Our review screened 330 publications (2019-2025) and retained 12 finance-relevant studies for analysis; we further conducted six interviews and collected 14 survey responses from banks and consultancies. Across research and practice, we identify four recurrent socio-technical failure modes that hinder trustworthy AI-driven CTI: (i) shadow use of public AI tools outside institutional controls, (ii) license-first enablement without operational integration, (iii) attacker-perception gaps that limit adversarial threat modeling, and (iv) missing security for the AI models themselves, including limited monitoring, robustness evaluation and audit-ready evidence. Survey results provide additional insights: 71.4% of respondents expect AI to become central within five years, 57.1% report infrequent current use due to interpretability and assurance concerns and 28.6% report direct encounters with adversarial risks. Based on these findings, we derive three security-oriented operational safeguards for AI-enabled CTI deployments.

Irdin Pekaric, Raffaela Groner, Alexander Raschke et al.

In the rapidly evolving landscape of software engineering, the demand for robust and secure systems has become increasingly critical. This is especially true for self-adaptive systems due to their complexity and the dynamic environments in which they operate. To address this issue, we designed and developed the SAFT-GT toolchain that tackles the multifaceted challenges associated with ensuring both safety and security. This paper provides a comprehensive description of the toolchain's architecture and functionalities, including the Attack-Fault Trees generation and model combination approaches. We emphasize the toolchain's ability to integrate seamlessly with existing systems, allowing for enhanced safety and security analyses without requiring extensive modifications and domain knowledge. Our proposed approach can address evolving security threats, including both known vulnerabilities and emerging attack vectors that could compromise the system. As a use case for the toolchain, we integrate it into the feedback loop of self-adaptive systems. Finally, to validate the practical applicability of the toolchain, we conducted an extensive user study involving domain experts, whose insights and feedback underscore the toolchain's relevance and usability in real-world scenarios. Our findings demonstrate the toolchain's effectiveness in real-world applications while highlighting areas for future improvements. The toolchain and associated resources are available in an open-source repository to promote reproducibility and encourage further research in this field.

Roy Ricaldi, Maximilian Schafer, Philipp Zech et al.

The dark web hosts a dynamic ecosystem of cybercrime forums and marketplaces that adapt to law enforcement pressure, technological change, and economic incentives. Prior research has extracted cyber threat intelligence from these platforms using static snapshots, with limited attention to how discussions evolve over time. In this study, we conduct a longitudinal analysis of 25,065 websites in the dark web using 11,403,638 HTML snapshots (approximately 1245.38 GB) collected over six years. We develop a longitudinal topic-modeling framework combining domain-specific embeddings, density-based clustering and temporal aggregation to measure topic prevalence and lifecycle at the website level. Our analysis identifies 55 thematic clusters. We find that approximately 75% of total discussion volume is concentrated in a small set of persistent core topics, while short-lived themes account for approximately 3% of activity. The median topic lifespan is 75 months, indicating gradual thematic evolution rather than abrupt replacement.