Pietro L. Campos

Eduardo C. Fidelis, Fabio Reway, Herick Y. S. Ribeiro et al.

The main approaches for simulating FMCW radar are based on ray tracing, which is usually computationally intensive and do not account for background noise. This work proposes a faster method for FMCW radar simulation capable of generating synthetic raw radar data using generative adversarial networks (GAN). The code and pre-trained weights are open-source and available on GitHub. This method generates 16 simultaneous chirps, which allows the generated data to be used for the further development of algorithms for processing radar data (filtering and clustering). This can increase the potential for data augmentation, e.g., by generating data in non-existent or safety-critical scenarios that are not reproducible in real life. In this work, the GAN was trained with radar measurements of a motorcycle and used to generate synthetic raw radar data of a motorcycle traveling in a straight line. For generating this data, the distance of the motorcycle and Gaussian noise are used as input to the neural network. The synthetic generated radar chirps were evaluated using the Frechet Inception Distance (FID). Then, the Range-Azimuth (RA) map is calculated twice: first, based on synthetic data using this GAN and, second, based on real data. Based on these RA maps, an algorithm with adaptive threshold and edge detection is used for object detection. The results have shown that the data is realistic in terms of coherent radar reflections of the motorcycle and background noise based on the comparison of chirps, the RA maps and the object detection results. Thus, the proposed method in this work has shown to minimize the simulation-to-reality gap for the generation of radar data.

Pedro R. Pires, Gregorio F. Azevedo, Rafael T. Sereicikas et al.

With the increasing availability of online information, recommender systems have become an important tool for many web-based systems. Due to the continuous aspect of recommendation environments, these systems increasingly rely on contextual multi-armed bandits (CMAB) to deliver personalized and real-time suggestions. A critical yet underexplored component in these systems is the representation of user state, which typically encapsulates the user's interaction history and is deeply correlated with the model's decisions and learning. In this paper, we investigate the impact of different embedding-based state representations derived from matrix factorization models on the performance of traditional CMAB algorithms. Our large-scale experiments reveal that variations in state representation can lead to improvements greater than those achieved by changing the bandit algorithm itself. Furthermore, no single embedding or aggregation strategy consistently dominates across datasets, underscoring the need for domain-specific evaluation. These results expose a substantial gap in the literature and emphasize that advancing bandit-based recommender systems requires a holistic approach that prioritizes embedding quality and state construction alongside algorithmic innovation. The source code for our experiments is publicly available on https://github.com/UFSCar-LaSID/bandits_blind_spot.

Pedro R. Pires, Gregorio F. Azevedo, Pietro L. Campos et al.

Multi-Armed Bandit (MAB) algorithms are widely used in recommender systems that require continuous, incremental learning. A core aspect of MABs is the exploration-exploitation trade-off: choosing between exploiting items likely to be enjoyed and exploring new ones to gather information. In contextual linear bandits, this trade-off is particularly central, as many variants share the same linear regression backbone and differ primarily in their exploration strategies. Despite its prevalent use, offline evaluation of MABs is increasingly recognized for its limitations in reliably assessing exploration behavior. This study conducts an extensive offline empirical comparison of several linear MABs. Strikingly, across over 90% of various datasets, a greedy linear model, with no type of exploration, consistently achieves top-tier performance, often outperforming or matching its exploratory counterparts. This observation is further corroborated by hyperparameter optimization, which consistently favors configurations that minimize exploration, suggesting that pure exploitation is the dominant strategy within these evaluation settings. Our results expose significant inadequacies in offline evaluation protocols for bandits, particularly concerning their capacity to reflect true exploratory efficacy. Consequently, this research underscores the urgent necessity for developing more robust assessment methodologies, guiding future investigations into alternative evaluation frameworks for interactive learning in recommender systems.