Stefania La Vattiata

Kin G. Olivares, David Luo, Cristian Challu et al.

Large collections of time series data are often organized into hierarchies with different levels of aggregation; examples include product and geographical groupings. Probabilistic coherent forecasting is tasked to produce forecasts consistent across levels of aggregation. In this study, we propose to augment neural forecasting architectures with a coherent multivariate mixture output. We optimize the networks with a composite likelihood objective, allowing us to capture time series' relationships while maintaining high computational efficiency. Our approach demonstrates 13.2% average accuracy improvements on most datasets compared to state-of-the-art baselines. We conduct ablation studies of the framework components and provide theoretical foundations for them. To assist related work, the code is available at this https://github.com/Nixtla/neuralforecast.

Malcolm Wolff, Matthew Li, Ravi Kiran Selvam et al.

Despite significant advancements in time series forecasting, accurate modeling of time series with strong heterogeneity in magnitude and/or sparsity patterns remains challenging for state-of-the-art deep learning architectures. We identify several factors that lead existing models to systematically underperform on low-magnitude and sparse time series, including loss functions with implicit biases toward high-magnitude series, training-time sampling methods, and limitations of time series encoding methods. SPADE-S is a robust forecasting architecture that significantly reduces magnitude- and sparsity-based systematic biases and improves overall prediction accuracy. Empirical results demonstrate that SPADE-S outperforms existing state-of-the-art approaches across a diverse set of use cases in demand forecasting. In particular, we show that, depending on the quantile forecast and magnitude of the series, SPADE-S can improve forecast accuracy by up to 15%. This results in P90 overall forecast accuracy gains of 2.21%, 6.58%, and 4.28%, and P50 forecast accuracy gains of 0.92%, 0.77%, and 1.95%, respectively, for each of three distinct datasets, ranging from 3 million to 700 million series, from a large online retailer.