Bogdan Bercean

Bogdan Alexandru Bercean, Florinel Alin Croitoru, Vlad Hondru et al.

Anomaly detection in medical images is a challenging task, since anomalies are not typically available during training. Recent methods leverage a single pretext task coupled with a large-scale pre-trained model to reach state-of-the-art performance. Instead, we propose to learn multiple self-supervised and pseudo-labeling tasks from scratch, using a joint model based on Mixture-of-Experts (MoE). By carefully integrating multiple proxy tasks, the joint model effectively learns a robust representation of normal anatomical structures, so that anomaly scores can be derived based on how well the multi-task learner (MTL) solves each task during inference. We perform comprehensive experiments on BMAD, a recent benchmark that comprises a broad range of medical image modalities. The empirical results indicate that our multi-task learner is an effective anomaly detector, outperforming all state-of-the-art competitors on BMAD. Moreover, our model produces interpretable anomaly maps, potentially helping physicians in providing more accurate diagnoses.

Maxime Kayser, Bayar Menzat, Cornelius Emde et al.

The growing capabilities of AI models are leading to their wider use, including in safety-critical domains. Explainable AI (XAI) aims to make these models safer to use by making their inference process more transparent. However, current explainability methods are seldom evaluated in the way they are intended to be used: by real-world end users. To address this, we conducted a large-scale user study with 85 healthcare practitioners in the context of human-AI collaborative chest X-ray analysis. We evaluated three types of explanations: visual explanations (saliency maps), natural language explanations, and a combination of both modalities. We specifically examined how different explanation types influence users depending on whether the AI advice and explanations are factually correct. We find that text-based explanations lead to significant over-reliance, which is alleviated by combining them with saliency maps. We also observe that the quality of explanations, that is, how much factually correct information they entail, and how much this aligns with AI correctness, significantly impacts the usefulness of the different explanation types.