Manolis Vasilakis

Michael Lampis, Valia Mitsou, Edouard Nemery et al.

In this paper we study the Spanning Tree Congestion problem, where we are given a graph $G=(V,E)$ and are asked to find a spanning tree $T$ of minimum maximum congestion. Here, the congestion of an edge $e\in T$ is the number of edges $uv\in E$ such that the (unique) path from $u$ to $v$ in $T$ traverses $e$. We consider this well-studied NP-hard problem from the point of view of (structural) parameterized complexity and obtain the following results. We resolve a natural open problem by showing that Spanning Tree Congestion is not FPT parameterized by treewidth (under standard assumptions). More strongly, we present a generic reduction which applies to (almost) any parameter of the form ``vertex-deletion distance to class $\mathcal{C}$'', thus obtaining W[1]-hardness for parameters more restricted than treewidth, including tree-depth plus feedback vertex set, or incomparable to treewidth, such as twin cover. Via a slight tweak of the same reduction we also show that the problem is NP-complete on interval graphs of modular-width $4$. Even though it is known that Spanning Tree Congestion remains NP-hard on instances with only one vertex of unbounded degree, it is currently open whether the problem remains hard on bounded-degree graphs. We resolve this question by showing NP-hardness on graphs of maximum degree 8. Complementing the problem's W[1]-hardness for treewidth...

Michael Lampis, Manolis Vasilakis

Capacitated Vertex Cover is the hard-capacitated variant of Vertex Cover: given a graph, a capacity for every vertex, and an integer $k$, the task is to select at most $k$ vertices that cover all edges and assign each edge to one of its chosen endpoints so that no chosen vertex receives more incident edges than its capacity. This problem is a classical benchmark in parameterized complexity, as it was among the first natural problems shown to be W[1]-hard when parameterized by treewidth. We revisit its exact complexity from a fine-grained parameterized perspective and obtain a much sharper picture for several standard parameters. For the natural parameter $k$, we prove under the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) that no algorithm with running time $k^{o(k)} n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$ exists. In particular, this shows that the known algorithms with running time $k^{\mathcal{O}(\mathrm{tw})} n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$ are essentially optimal. We then turn to more general structural parameters. For vertex cover number $\mathrm{vc}$, we give evidence against a $2^{\mathcal{O}(\mathrm{vc}^{2-\varepsilon})} n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$ algorithm, as such an improvement would imply corresponding progress for a broader class of integer-programming-type problems. We complement this barrier with a nearly matching upper bound for vertex integrity $\mathrm{vi}$, improving the previously known double-exponential dependence to an algorithm with running time $\mathrm{vi}^{\mathcal{O}(\mathrm{vi}^{2})} n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$ using $N$-fold integer programming. For treewidth, we show that the standard dynamic programming algorithm with running time $n^{\mathcal{O}(\mathrm{tw})}$ is essentially optimal under the ETH, even if one parameterizes by tree-depth. Turning to clique-width, we prove that Capacitated Vertex Cover remains NP-hard already on graphs of linear clique-width $6$...

Édouard Bonnet, Carl Feghali, Manolis Vasilakis

Given a connected graph $G$ and a source $s \in V(G)$, what is the smallest number of rounds necessary for all vertices of $G$ to receive a message initially only held by $s$, where at each round every informed vertex passes the message to one of its neighbors? This problem is called Telephone Broadcast and is suprisingly hard: it remains NP-hard on cycles intersecting at a single shared vertex, in particular, graphs of pathwidth 2 with a linear feedback vertex set of size 1, as well as on graphs with treedepth at most 6 [Egami et al.; MFCS '25]. Vertex cover number, vertex integrity, and distance to clique are among the few parameters for which Telephone Broadcast is fixed-parameter tractable. There is a $2^{\mathcal{O}(\mathrm{vc}^3)} n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$-time algorithm parameterized by vertex cover number $\mathrm{vc}$ [Fomin, Fraigniaud, Golovach; TCS '24], a double-exponential algorithm parameterized by vertex integrity $\mathrm{vi}$, and a $2^{\mathcal{O}(k^2)} n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$-time algorithm parameterized by distance to clique $k$ [Egami et al.; MFCS '25]. In this paper, we give improved parameterized algorithms for Telephone Broadcast with running times $2^{\mathcal{O}(\mathrm{vc} \log \mathrm{vc})} n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$, $2^{\mathcal{O}(\mathrm{vi}^2 \log \mathrm{vi})} n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$, and $2^{\mathcal{O}(k \log k)} n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$. The main ingredient that makes our algorithms faster is a Turing reduction to edge-weighted $b$-Matching.

Lapo Cioni, Sotiris Kanellopoulos, Edouard Nemery et al.

The Minimum Temporal Path Cover (TPC) and Minimum Temporally Disjoint Path Cover (TDPC) problems were introduced by [Chakraborty, Dailly, Foucaud, Klasing, MFCS '24]. Both were shown to be NP-hard on temporal DAGs, while the latter is also NP-hard on temporal oriented trees. All tractable cases for T(D)PC established in that paper satisfy a temporal Dilworth property, namely that the size of the minimum T(D)PC is equal to the size of the maximum antichain. This raises a natural question: is T(D)PC polynomial-time solvable under the promise that the respective Dilworth property holds? In this work, we answer this question in the affirmative for both problems, proving in fact that, under the respective promise, the size of the minimum T(D)PC is exactly equal to the Lovász number of the connectivity graph. In another direction, we establish parameterized algorithms and hardness results for TPC and TDPC. Our main result is that TPC is W[1]-hard parameterized by the deletion distance to linear forest even for temporal graphs with two time-steps, answering in the negative an open question by Chakraborty et al. about whether an XP algorithm parameterized by treewidth plus number of time-steps can be improved to FPT. On the other hand, we prove that an FPT algorithm does exist if the vertex cover number is used as parameter instead of the treewidth in the above parameterization. We complement this with a proof that including the number of time-steps in the parameter is necessary to yield tractability, as, otherwise, both TPC and TDPC remain NP-hard even for constant vertex cover size. Along the way, we establish various other para-NP-hardness results involving structural parameters such as the pathwidth and the maximum degree of the underlying graph.