Vishal Ramesh

Vishal Ramesh, Aman Singh, Shishir Kolathaya

Series and parallel elastic actuators offer complementary but mutually exclusive advantages, yet no existing actuator enables real-time transition between these topologies during operation. This paper presents a novel actuator design called the Dual-Topology Elastic Actuator (DTEA), which enables dynamic switching between SEA and PEA topologies during operation. A proof-of-concept prototype of the DTEA is developed to demonstrate the feasibility of the topology-switching mechanism. Experiments are conducted to evaluate the robustness and timing of the switching mechanism under operational conditions. The actuator successfully performed 324 topology-switching cycles under load without damage, demonstrating the robustness of the mechanism. The measured switching time between SEA and PEA modes is under 33.33 ms. Additional experiments are conducted to characterize the static stiffness and disturbance rejection performance in both SEA and PEA modes. Static stiffness tests show that the PEA mode is 1.53x stiffer than the SEA mode, with KSEA = 5.57 +/- 0.02 Nm/rad and KPEA = 8.54 +/- 0.02 Nm/rad. Disturbance rejection experiments show that the mean peak deflection in SEA mode is 2.26x larger than in PEA mode (5.2 deg vs. 2.3 deg), while the mean settling time is 3.45x longer (1380 ms vs. 400 ms). The observed behaviors are consistent with the known characteristics of conventional SEA and PEA actuators, validating the functionality of both modes in the DTEA actuator.

Vishal Ramesh, Rui Zhao, Naman Goel

Data on the Web has fueled much of the recent progress in AI. As more high-quality data becomes difficult to access, synthetic data is emerging as a promising solution for privacy-friendly data release and complementing real datasets in developing robust and safe AI. But there is limited work on decentralised, scalable and contributor-centric synthetic data generation systems. A recent proposal, called Libertas, allows data contributors to autonomously participate in joint computations over their Web data without relying on a trusted centre. Libertas uses Solid (Social Linked Data) and MPC (Secure Multi-Party Computation) to achieve this goal. Solid is a decentralised Web specification that lets anyone store their data securely in their personal decentralised data stores called Pods and control which applications have access to their data. MPC refers to the set of cryptographic methods for different parties to jointly compute a function over their inputs while keeping those inputs private. Thus, Libertas can also be used to generate synthetic data from otherwise inaccessible Web data in a responsible way, by ensuring contributor autonomy, decentralisation and privacy. However, the scalability of this system remains limited due to the high computation and communication costs in MPC. In this paper, we show how one can improve Libertas using secure enclaves (in addition to MPC) to address the scalability challenge. Secure enclaves such as Intel SGX rely on hardware based features for confidentiality and integrity of code and data. We discuss a principled approach for integrating SGX within the Libertas architecture for scalable differentially private synthetic data generation, and support our analysis with rigorous empirical results on simulated and real datasets and different synthetic data generation algorithms.

Vishal Ramesh

Variable impedance model predictive control (MPC) formulations that treat joint stiffness as an instantaneous decision variable operate on a feasible set strictly larger than the physically realizable set under first-order actuator dynamics. We identify this as a formulation error rather than a modeling approximation, formalize the distinction between the parameter-based feasible set Fparam and the realizable set Freal, and characterize the regime of mismatch via the dimensionless parameter alpha = omega_sT (actuator bandwidth times task timescale). For the 1D hopping monoped, we prove that below an analytical threshold alpha_crit derived in closed form from task physics, no admissible stiffness command realizes the parameter-based prediction. Numerical validation in 1D shows monotonic deviation growth as alpha decreases, with the predicted scaling holding across ten parameter combinations (log-log R2 = 0.99). Mechanism transfer to planar spring-loaded inverted pendulum dynamics confirms center-of-mass and stance-timing deviation as the primary consequence, with regime-dependent friction effects as a tertiary observable. A second threshold alpha_infeas < alpha_crit establishes a floor below which restricting the admissible stiffness range cannot repair realizability, closing the conservative-tuning objection on structural grounds. Augmenting the prediction state with stiffness closes the mismatch by construction.

Vishal Ramesh, Antony Thomas

Multi-UAV inspection missions require spare drones to replace active drones during recharging cycles. Existing fleet-sizing approaches often assume steady-state operating conditions that do not apply to finite-horizon missions, or they treat replacement requests as statistically independent events. The latter provides per-request blocking guarantees that fail to translate to mission-level reliability when demands cluster. This paper identifies a structural failure mode where efficient routing assigns similar workloads to each UAV, leading to synchronized battery depletion and replacement bursts that exhaust the spare pool even when average capacity is sufficient. We derive a closed-form sufficient fleet-sizing rule, k = m(ceil(R) + 1), where m is the number of active UAVs and R is the recovery-to-active time ratio. This additive buffer of m spares absorbs worst-case synchronized demand at recovery-cycle boundaries and ensures mission-level reliability even when all UAVs deplete simultaneously. Monte Carlo validation across five scenarios (m in [2, 10], R in [0.87, 3.39], 1000 trials each) shows that Erlang-B sizing with a per-request blocking target epsilon = 0.01 drops to 69.9% mission success at R = 3.39, with 95% of spare exhaustion events concentrated in the top-decile 5-minute demand windows. In contrast, the proposed rule maintains 99.8% success (Wilson 95% lower bound 99.3%) across all tested conditions, including wind variability up to CV = 0.30, while requiring only four additional drones in the most demanding scenario.