Phillip Pope

LG
5papers
505citations
Novelty46%
AI Score29

5 Papers

LGOct 28, 2023
Towards Combinatorial Generalization for Catalysts: A Kohn-Sham Charge-Density Approach

Phillip Pope, David Jacobs

The Kohn-Sham equations underlie many important applications such as the discovery of new catalysts. Recent machine learning work on catalyst modeling has focused on prediction of the energy, but has so far not yet demonstrated significant out-of-distribution generalization. Here we investigate another approach based on the pointwise learning of the Kohn-Sham charge-density. On a new dataset of bulk catalysts with charge densities, we show density models can generalize to new structures with combinations of elements not seen at train time, a form of combinatorial generalization. We show that over 80% of binary and ternary test cases achieve faster convergence than standard baselines in Density Functional Theory, amounting to an average reduction of 13% in the number of iterations required to reach convergence, which may be of independent interest. Our results suggest that density learning is a viable alternative, trading greater inference costs for a step towards combinatorial generalization, a key property for applications.

CVApr 18, 2021Code
The Intrinsic Dimension of Images and Its Impact on Learning

Phillip Pope, Chen Zhu, Ahmed Abdelkader et al.

It is widely believed that natural image data exhibits low-dimensional structure despite the high dimensionality of conventional pixel representations. This idea underlies a common intuition for the remarkable success of deep learning in computer vision. In this work, we apply dimension estimation tools to popular datasets and investigate the role of low-dimensional structure in deep learning. We find that common natural image datasets indeed have very low intrinsic dimension relative to the high number of pixels in the images. Additionally, we find that low dimensional datasets are easier for neural networks to learn, and models solving these tasks generalize better from training to test data. Along the way, we develop a technique for validating our dimension estimation tools on synthetic data generated by GANs allowing us to actively manipulate the intrinsic dimension by controlling the image generation process. Code for our experiments may be found here https://github.com/ppope/dimensions.

CVJan 26, 2022
A Comprehensive Study of Image Classification Model Sensitivity to Foregrounds, Backgrounds, and Visual Attributes

Mazda Moayeri, Phillip Pope, Yogesh Balaji et al.

While datasets with single-label supervision have propelled rapid advances in image classification, additional annotations are necessary in order to quantitatively assess how models make predictions. To this end, for a subset of ImageNet samples, we collect segmentation masks for the entire object and $18$ informative attributes. We call this dataset RIVAL10 (RIch Visual Attributes with Localization), consisting of roughly $26k$ instances over $10$ classes. Using RIVAL10, we evaluate the sensitivity of a broad set of models to noise corruptions in foregrounds, backgrounds and attributes. In our analysis, we consider diverse state-of-the-art architectures (ResNets, Transformers) and training procedures (CLIP, SimCLR, DeiT, Adversarial Training). We find that, somewhat surprisingly, in ResNets, adversarial training makes models more sensitive to the background compared to foreground than standard training. Similarly, contrastively-trained models also have lower relative foreground sensitivity in both transformers and ResNets. Lastly, we observe intriguing adaptive abilities of transformers to increase relative foreground sensitivity as corruption level increases. Using saliency methods, we automatically discover spurious features that drive the background sensitivity of models and assess alignment of saliency maps with foregrounds. Finally, we quantitatively study the attribution problem for neural features by comparing feature saliency with ground-truth localization of semantic attributes.

LGNov 20, 2019
Adversarial Robustness of Flow-Based Generative Models

Phillip Pope, Yogesh Balaji, Soheil Feizi

Flow-based generative models leverage invertible generator functions to fit a distribution to the training data using maximum likelihood. Despite their use in several application domains, robustness of these models to adversarial attacks has hardly been explored. In this paper, we study adversarial robustness of flow-based generative models both theoretically (for some simple models) and empirically (for more complex ones). First, we consider a linear flow-based generative model and compute optimal sample-specific and universal adversarial perturbations that maximally decrease the likelihood scores. Using this result, we study the robustness of the well-known adversarial training procedure, where we characterize the fundamental trade-off between model robustness and accuracy. Next, we empirically study the robustness of two prominent deep, non-linear, flow-based generative models, namely GLOW and RealNVP. We design two types of adversarial attacks; one that minimizes the likelihood scores of in-distribution samples, while the other that maximizes the likelihood scores of out-of-distribution ones. We find that GLOW and RealNVP are extremely sensitive to both types of attacks. Finally, using a hybrid adversarial training procedure, we significantly boost the robustness of these generative models.

LGDec 1, 2018
Discovering Molecular Functional Groups Using Graph Convolutional Neural Networks

Phillip Pope, Soheil Kolouri, Mohammad Rostrami et al.

Functional groups (FGs) are molecular substructures that are served as a foundation for analyzing and predicting chemical properties of molecules. Automatic discovery of FGs will impact various fields of research, including medicinal chemistry and material sciences, by reducing the amount of lab experiments required for discovery or synthesis of new molecules. In this paper, we investigate methods based on graph convolutional neural networks (GCNNs) for localizing FGs that contribute to specific chemical properties of interest. In our framework, molecules are modeled as undirected relational graphs with atoms as nodes and bonds as edges. Using this relational graph structure, we trained GCNNs in a supervised way on experimentally-validated molecular training sets to predict specific chemical properties, e.g., toxicity. Upon learning a GCNN, we analyzed its activation patterns to automatically identify FGs using four different explainability methods that we have developed: gradient-based saliency maps, Class Activation Mapping (CAM), gradient-weighted CAM (Grad-CAM), and Excitation Back-Propagation. Although these methods are originally derived for convolutional neural networks (CNNs), we adapt them to develop the corresponding suitable versions for GCNNs. We evaluated the contrastive power of these methods with respect to the specificity of the identified molecular substructures and their relevance for chemical functions. Grad-CAM had the highest contrastive power and generated qualitatively the best FGs. This work paves the way for automatic analysis and design of new molecules.