Michael Benedikt

Michael Benedikt, Dmitry Chistikov, Alessio Mansutti

We investigate expansions of Presburger arithmetic, i.e., the theory of the integers with addition and order, with additional structure related to exponentiation: either a function that takes a number to the power of $2$, or a predicate for the powers of $2$. The latter theory, denoted $\mathrm{PresPower}$, was introduced by Büchi as a first attempt at characterizing the sets of tuples of numbers that can be expressed using finite automata; Büchi's method does not give an elementary upper bound, and the complexity of this theory has been open. The former theory, denoted as $\mathrm{PresExp}$, was shown decidable by Semenov; while the decision procedure for this theory differs radically from the automata-based method proposed by Büchi, Semenov's method is also non-elementary. And in fact, the theory with the power function has a non-elementary lower bound. In this paper, we show that while Semenov's and Büchi's approaches yield non-elementary blow-ups for $\mathrm{PresPower}$, the theory is in fact decidable in triply exponential time, similarly to the best known quantifier-elimination algorithm for Presburger arithmetic. We also provide a $\mathrm{NExpTime}$ upper bound for the existential fragment of $\mathrm{PresExp}$, a step towards a finer-grained analysis of its complexity. Both these results are established by analyzing a single parameterized satisfiability algorithm for $\mathrm{PresExp}$, which can be specialized to either the setting of $\mathrm{PresPower}$ or the existential theory of $\mathrm{PresExp}$. Besides the new upper bounds for the existential theory of $\mathrm{PresExp}$ and $\mathrm{PresPower}$, we believe our algorithm provides new intuition for the decidability of these theories, and for the features that lead to non-elementary blow-ups.

Michael Benedikt, Anthony Widjaja Lin, Di-De Yen

The study of graph queries in database theory has spanned more than three decades, resulting in a multitude of proposals for graph query languages. We can identify three main families of languages, with the canonical representatives being: (1) regular path queries, (2) walk logic, and (3) first-order logic with transitive closure operators. This paper provides a complete picture of the expressive power of these languages in the context of data graphs. Specifically, we consider a graph data model that supports querying over both data and topology. For example, ``Does there exist a path between two different persons in a social network with the same last name?''. We also show that an extension of (1) with regular path comparisons, augmented with transitive closure operators, can unify the expressivity of (1)--(3).

Zsolt Zombori, Agapi Rissaki, Kristóf Szabó et al.

We consider learning a probabilistic classifier from partially-labelled supervision (inputs denoted with multiple possibilities) using standard neural architectures with a softmax as the final layer. We identify a bias phenomenon that can arise from the softmax layer in even simple architectures that prevents proper exploration of alternative options, making the dynamics of gradient descent overly sensitive to initialisation. We introduce a novel loss function that allows for unbiased exploration within the space of alternative outputs. We give a theoretical justification for our loss function, and provide an extensive evaluation of its impact on synthetic data, on standard partially labelled benchmarks and on a contributed novel benchmark related to an existing rule learning challenge.

Sam Adam-Day, Michael Benedikt, İsmail İlkan Ceylan et al.

We present a new angle on the expressive power of graph neural networks (GNNs) by studying how the predictions of real-valued GNN classifiers, such as those classifying graphs probabilistically, evolve as we apply them on larger graphs drawn from some random graph model. We show that the output converges to a constant function, which upper-bounds what these classifiers can uniformly express. This strong convergence phenomenon applies to a very wide class of GNNs, including state of the art models, with aggregates including mean and the attention-based mechanism of graph transformers. Our results apply to a broad class of random graph models, including sparse and dense variants of the Erdős-Rényi model, the stochastic block model, and the Barabási-Albert model. We empirically validate these findings, observing that the convergence phenomenon appears not only on random graphs but also on some real-world graphs.

Antoine Amarilli, Michael Benedikt, Pierre Bourhis et al.

We consider entailment problems involving powerful constraint languages such as frontier-guarded existential rules in which we impose additional semantic restrictions on a set of distinguished relations. We consider restricting a relation to be transitive, restricting a relation to be the transitive closure of another relation, and restricting a relation to be a linear order. We give some natural variants of guardedness that allow inference to be decidable in each case, and isolate the complexity of the corresponding decision problems. Finally we show that slight changes in these conditions lead to undecidability.

Michael Benedikt, Pierre Bourhis, Louis Jachiet et al.

Data integration systems allow users to access data sitting in multiple sources by means of queries over a global schema, related to the sources via mappings. Data sources often contain sensitive information, and thus an analysis is needed to verify that a schema satisfies a privacy policy, given as a set of queries whose answers should not be accessible to users. Such an analysis should take into account not only knowledge that an attacker may have about the mappings, but also what they may know about the semantics of the sources. In this paper, we show that source constraints can have a dramatic impact on disclosure analysis. We study the problem of determining whether a given data integration system discloses a source query to an attacker in the presence of constraints, providing both lower and upper bounds on source-aware disclosure analysis.

Michael Benedikt, Boris Motik, Efthymia Tsamoura

Inspired by the magic sets for Datalog, we present a novel goal-driven approach for answering queries over terminating existential rules with equality (aka TGDs and EGDs). Our technique improves the performance of query answering by pruning the consequences that are not relevant for the query. This is challenging in our setting because equalities can potentially affect all predicates in a dataset. We address this problem by combining the existing singularization technique with two new ingredients: an algorithm for identifying the rules relevant to a query and a new magic sets algorithm. We show empirically that our technique can significantly improve the performance of query answering, and that it can mean the difference between answering a query in a few seconds or not being able to process the query at all.