Muhammad Alhaddad

2papers

2 Papers

ROOct 25, 2023Code
Neural Potential Field for Obstacle-Aware Local Motion Planning

Muhammad Alhaddad, Konstantin Mironov, Aleksey Staroverov et al.

Model predictive control (MPC) may provide local motion planning for mobile robotic platforms. The challenging aspect is the analytic representation of collision cost for the case when both the obstacle map and robot footprint are arbitrary. We propose a Neural Potential Field: a neural network model that returns a differentiable collision cost based on robot pose, obstacle map, and robot footprint. The differentiability of our model allows its usage within the MPC solver. It is computationally hard to solve problems with a very high number of parameters. Therefore, our architecture includes neural image encoders, which transform obstacle maps and robot footprints into embeddings, which reduce problem dimensionality by two orders of magnitude. The reference data for network training are generated based on algorithmic calculation of a signed distance function. Comparative experiments showed that the proposed approach is comparable with existing local planners: it provides trajectories with outperforming smoothness, comparable path length, and safe distance from obstacles. Experiment on Husky UGV mobile robot showed that our approach allows real-time and safe local planning. The code for our approach is presented at https://github.com/cog-isa/NPField together with demo video.

41.5ROMar 24Code
Dynamic Neural Potential Field: Online Trajectory Optimization in the Presence of Moving Obstacles

Aleksei Staroverov, Muhammad Alhaddad, Aditya Narendra et al.

Generalist robot policies must operate safely and reliably in everyday human environments such as homes, offices, and warehouses, where people and objects move unpredictably. We present Dynamic Neural Potential Field (NPField-GPT), a learning-enhanced model predictive control (MPC) framework that couples classical optimization with a Transformer-based predictor of footprint-aware repulsive potentials. Given an occupancy sub-map, robot footprint, and optional dynamic-obstacle cues, our NPField-GPT model forecasts a horizon of differentiable potentials that are injected into a sequential quadratic MPC program via L4CasADi, yielding real-time, constraint-aware trajectory optimization. We additionally study two baselines: NPField-StaticMLP, where a dynamic scene is treated as a sequence of static maps; and NPField-DynamicMLP, which predicts the future potential sequence in parallel with an MLP. In dynamic indoor scenarios from BenchMR and on a Husky UGV in office corridors, NPField-GPT produces more efficient and safer trajectories under motion changes, while StaticMLP/DynamicMLP offer lower latency. We also compare with the CIAO* and MPPI baselines. Across methods, the Transformer+MPC synergy preserves the transparency and stability of model-based planning while learning only the part that benefits from data: spatiotemporal collision risk. Code and trained models are available at https://github.com/CognitiveAISystems/Dynamic-Neural-Potential-Field