Stefan Thalmann

Armin Haberl, Jürgen Fleiß, Dominik Kowald et al.

aTrain is an open-source and offline tool for transcribing audio data in multiple languages with CPU and NVIDIA GPU support. It is specifically designed for researchers using qualitative data generated from various forms of speech interactions with research participants. aTrain requires no programming skills, runs on most computers, does not require an internet connection, and was verified not to upload data to any server. aTrain combines OpenAI's Whisper model with speaker recognition to provide output that integrates with the popular qualitative data analysis software tools MAXQDA and ATLAS.ti. It has an easy-to-use graphical interface and is provided as a Windows-App through the Microsoft Store allowing for simple installation by researchers. The source code is freely available on GitHub. Having developed aTrain with a focus on speed on local computers, we show that the transcription time on current mobile CPUs is around 2 to 3 times the duration of the audio file using the highest-accuracy transcription models. If an entry-level graphics card is available, the transcription speed increases to 20% of the audio duration.

Harald Semmelrock, Tony Ross-Hellauer, Simone Kopeinik et al.

Many research fields are currently reckoning with issues of poor levels of reproducibility. Some label it a "crisis", and research employing or building Machine Learning (ML) models is no exception. Issues including lack of transparency, data or code, poor adherence to standards, and the sensitivity of ML training conditions mean that many papers are not even reproducible in principle. Where they are, though, reproducibility experiments have found worryingly low degrees of similarity with original results. Despite previous appeals from ML researchers on this topic and various initiatives from conference reproducibility tracks to the ACM's new Emerging Interest Group on Reproducibility and Replicability, we contend that the general community continues to take this issue too lightly. Poor reproducibility threatens trust in and integrity of research results. Therefore, in this article, we lay out a new perspective on the key barriers and drivers (both procedural and technical) to increased reproducibility at various levels (methods, code, data, and experiments). We then map the drivers to the barriers to give concrete advice for strategies for researchers to mitigate reproducibility issues in their own work, to lay out key areas where further research is needed in specific areas, and to further ignite discussion on the threat presented by these urgent issues.