Ali Babar

Boyu Zhang, Hongyang Yang, Tianyu Zhou et al.

Financial sentiment analysis is critical for valuation and investment decision-making. Traditional NLP models, however, are limited by their parameter size and the scope of their training datasets, which hampers their generalization capabilities and effectiveness in this field. Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) pre-trained on extensive corpora have demonstrated superior performance across various NLP tasks due to their commendable zero-shot abilities. Yet, directly applying LLMs to financial sentiment analysis presents challenges: The discrepancy between the pre-training objective of LLMs and predicting the sentiment label can compromise their predictive performance. Furthermore, the succinct nature of financial news, often devoid of sufficient context, can significantly diminish the reliability of LLMs' sentiment analysis. To address these challenges, we introduce a retrieval-augmented LLMs framework for financial sentiment analysis. This framework includes an instruction-tuned LLMs module, which ensures LLMs behave as predictors of sentiment labels, and a retrieval-augmentation module which retrieves additional context from reliable external sources. Benchmarked against traditional models and LLMs like ChatGPT and LLaMA, our approach achieves 15\% to 48\% performance gain in accuracy and F1 score.

Utku Boran Torun, Veli Karakaya, Ali Babar et al.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly embedded in software engineering (SE) tools, powering applications such as code generation, automated code review, and bug triage. As these LLM-based AI for Software Engineering (AI4SE) systems transition from experimental prototypes to widely deployed tools, the question of what it means to evaluate their behavior reliably has become both critical and unanswered. Unlike traditional SE or machine learning systems, LLM-based tools often produce open-ended, natural language outputs, admit multiple valid answers, and exhibit non-deterministic behavior across runs. These characteristics fundamentally challenge long-standing evaluation assumptions such as the existence of a single ground truth, deterministic outputs, and objective correctness. In this paper, we examine LLM evaluation as a general, task-dependent concept through the lens of SE tasks. We discuss why reliable evaluation is essential for trust, adoption, and meaningful assessment of LLM-based tools, summarize the current state of evaluation practices, and highlight their limitations in realistic AI4SE settings. We then identify key challenges facing current approaches, including the absence of stable ground truth, subjectivity and multi-dimensional quality, evaluation instability due to non-determinism, limitations of automated and model-based evaluation, and fragmentation of evaluation practices. Finally, we outline future directions aimed at advancing LLM evaluation toward more robust, scalable, and trustworthy methodologies, to stimulate discussion on principled evaluation practices that can keep pace with the growing role of LLMs in SE.

Thanh Thi Nguyen, Hammad Tahir, Mohamed Abdelrazek et al.

Credit card frauds are at an ever-increasing rate and have become a major problem in the financial sector. Because of these frauds, card users are hesitant in making purchases and both the merchants and financial institutions bear heavy losses. Some major challenges in credit card frauds involve the availability of public data, high class imbalance in data, changing nature of frauds and the high number of false alarms. Machine learning techniques have been used to detect credit card frauds but no fraud detection systems have been able to offer great efficiency to date. Recent development of deep learning has been applied to solve complex problems in various areas. This paper presents a thorough study of deep learning methods for the credit card fraud detection problem and compare their performance with various machine learning algorithms on three different financial datasets. Experimental results show great performance of the proposed deep learning methods against traditional machine learning models and imply that the proposed approaches can be implemented effectively for real-world credit card fraud detection systems.

Ba Dung Le, Guanhua Wang, Mehwish Nasim et al.

Preventing organizations from Cyber exploits needs timely intelligence about Cyber vulnerabilities and attacks, referred as threats. Cyber threat intelligence can be extracted from various sources including social media platforms where users publish the threat information in real time. Gathering Cyber threat intelligence from social media sites is a time consuming task for security analysts that can delay timely response to emerging Cyber threats. We propose a framework for automatically gathering Cyber threat intelligence from Twitter by using a novelty detection model. Our model learns the features of Cyber threat intelligence from the threat descriptions published in public repositories such as Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) and classifies a new unseen tweet as either normal or anomalous to Cyber threat intelligence. We evaluate our framework using a purpose-built data set of tweets from 50 influential Cyber security related accounts over twelve months (in 2018). Our classifier achieves the F1-score of 0.643 for classifying Cyber threat tweets and outperforms several baselines including binary classification models. Our analysis of the classification results suggests that Cyber threat relevant tweets on Twitter do not often include the CVE identifier of the related threats. Hence, it would be valuable to collect these tweets and associate them with the related CVE identifier for cyber security applications.