Humayra Tasnim

Aritra Mazumder, Shubhashis Roy Dipta, Nusrat Jahan Lia et al.

Multi-agent systems achieve state-of-the-art outcomes through peer collaboration. However, when an agent in the pipeline silently drops a constraint, the system's final output may look correct even though the reasoning chain was quietly corrupted, and existing outcome-based evaluations are blind to such multi-hop process failures. To make these vulnerabilities measurable before deployment, we introduce AgentCollabBench, a diagnostic benchmark of 900 human-validated tasks spanning software engineering, DevOps, and data engineering. Each task isolates one of four behavioral risks: instruction decay (does a constraint survive peer pressure?), false-belief contagion (does a falsehood spread through consensus?), context leakage (does information bleed between tasks?), and tracer durability (does marked data reach the final agent?). Evaluating four modern LLMs (GPT 4.1 mini, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite, Qwen-3.5-35B-A3B, and Llama 3.1 8B Instruct), we expose model-specific vulnerability profiles invisible to outcome-only evaluation; Qwen-3.5-35B-A3B, for example, leads on tracer durability and instruction stability, while GPT 4.1 mini leads on leakage containment and false-belief resistance. Beyond per-model differences, communication topology emerges as a primary risk factor that explains 7-40% of the variance in multi-hop information survival. The effect traces to a synthesis bottleneck specific to converging-DAG nodes: an agent weighing competing parent inputs discards constraints carried by a minority branch, a bottleneck structurally absent from linear chains. AgentCollabBench demonstrates that suboptimal topology can silently erase the safeguards of highly capable models, arguing that multi-agent reliability is fundamentally a structural problem and that scaling model intelligence alone is no substitute for architecture.

Humayra Tasnim, Soumya Dutta, Melanie Moses

In the era of burgeoning data generation, managing and storing large-scale time-varying datasets poses significant challenges. With the rise of supercomputing capabilities, the volume of data produced has soared, intensifying storage and I/O overheads. To address this issue, we propose a dynamic spatio-temporal data summarization technique that identifies informative features in key timesteps and fuses less informative ones. This approach minimizes storage requirements while preserving data dynamics. Unlike existing methods, our method retains both raw and summarized timesteps, ensuring a comprehensive view of information changes over time. We utilize information-theoretic measures to guide the fusion process, resulting in a visual representation that captures essential data patterns. We demonstrate the versatility of our technique across diverse datasets, encompassing particle-based flow simulations, security and surveillance applications, and biological cell interactions within the immune system. Our research significantly contributes to the realm of data management, introducing enhanced efficiency and deeper insights across diverse multidisciplinary domains. We provide a streamlined approach for handling massive datasets that can be applied to in situ analysis as well as post hoc analysis. This not only addresses the escalating challenges of data storage and I/O overheads but also unlocks the potential for informed decision-making. Our method empowers researchers and experts to explore essential temporal dynamics while minimizing storage requirements, thereby fostering a more effective and intuitive understanding of complex data behaviors.