CVOct 21, 2022
Imbalanced Classification in Medical Imaging via RegroupingLe Peng, Yash Travadi, Rui Zhang et al.
We propose performing imbalanced classification by regrouping majority classes into small classes so that we turn the problem into balanced multiclass classification. This new idea is dramatically different from popular loss reweighting and class resampling methods. Our preliminary result on imbalanced medical image classification shows that this natural idea can substantially boost the classification performance as measured by average precision (approximately area-under-the-precision-recall-curve, or AUPRC), which is more appropriate for evaluating imbalanced classification than other metrics such as balanced accuracy.
LGFeb 17, 2023
Welfare and Fairness Dynamics in Federated Learning: A Client Selection PerspectiveYash Travadi, Le Peng, Xuan Bi et al.
Federated learning (FL) is a privacy-preserving learning technique that enables distributed computing devices to train shared learning models across data silos collaboratively. Existing FL works mostly focus on designing advanced FL algorithms to improve the model performance. However, the economic considerations of the clients, such as fairness and incentive, are yet to be fully explored. Without such considerations, self-motivated clients may lose interest and leave the federation. To address this problem, we designed a novel incentive mechanism that involves a client selection process to remove low-quality clients and a money transfer process to ensure a fair reward distribution. Our experimental results strongly demonstrate that the proposed incentive mechanism can effectively improve the duration and fairness of the federation.
LGMay 13
A Systematic Evaluation of Imbalance Handling Methods in Biomedical Binary ClassificationJiandong Chen, Lingjie Su, Le Peng et al.
Objective: The primary goal of this study was to systematically examine the impact of commonly used imbalance handling methods (IHMs) on predictive performance in biomedical binary classification, considering the interplay between model complexity and diverse data modalities. Material and Methods: We evaluated five representative IHMs: random undersampling (RUS), random oversampling (ROS), SMOTE, re-weighting (RW), and direct F1-score optimization (DMO), against a raw training (RAW) baseline. The evaluation encompassed three public biomedical datasets: MIMIC-III (tabular), ADE-Corpus-V2 (text), and MURA (image), spanning three common biomedical data modalities. To assess varying model complexity, we employed a range of architectures, from classical logistic regression and random forest to deep neural networks, including multilayer perceptron (MLP), BiLSTM, BERT, DenseNet, and DINOv2. Results: For simpler models such as logistic regression on tabular data, IHMs yielded no significant advantage over the RAW baseline, aligning with prior findings. However, clear benefits were observed for more complex models and unstructured data: (a) ROS and RW consistently enhanced the performance of powerful models; (b) direct F1-score optimization demonstrated utility primarily for unstructured text and image data; and (c) RUS and SMOTE consistently degraded performance and are therefore not recommended. Conclusion: The effectiveness of IHMs depends on both model complexity and data modality. Performance gains are most pronounced when leveraging appropriate IHMs, such as ROS, RW, and DMO, on high-complexity models.
LGJul 21, 2025Code
Exact Reformulation and Optimization for Direct Metric Optimization in Binary Imbalanced ClassificationLe Peng, Yash Travadi, Chuan He et al.
For classification with imbalanced class frequencies, i.e., imbalanced classification (IC), standard accuracy is known to be misleading as a performance measure. While most existing methods for IC resort to optimizing balanced accuracy (i.e., the average of class-wise recalls), they fall short in scenarios where the significance of classes varies or certain metrics should reach prescribed levels. In this paper, we study two key classification metrics, precision and recall, under three practical binary IC settings: fix precision optimize recall (FPOR), fix recall optimize precision (FROP), and optimize $F_β$-score (OFBS). Unlike existing methods that rely on smooth approximations to deal with the indicator function involved, \textit{we introduce, for the first time, exact constrained reformulations for these direct metric optimization (DMO) problems}, which can be effectively solved by exact penalty methods. Experiment results on multiple benchmark datasets demonstrate the practical superiority of our approach over the state-of-the-art methods for the three DMO problems. We also expect our exact reformulation and optimization (ERO) framework to be applicable to a wide range of DMO problems for binary IC and beyond. Our code is available at https://github.com/sun-umn/DMO.