Elias Malomgré

Elias Malomgré, Pieter Simoens

Multi-agent systems provide mature methodologies for role decomposition, coordination, and normative governance, capabilities that remain essential as increasingly powerful autonomous decision components are embedded within agent-based systems. While learned and generative models substantially expand system capability, their safety behavior is often entangled with training, making it opaque, difficult to audit, and costly to update after deployment. This paper formalizes the Alignment Flywheel as a governance-centric hybrid MAS architecture that decouples decision generation from safety governance. A Proposer, representing any autonomous decision component, generates candidate trajectories, while a Safety Oracle returns raw safety signals through a stable interface. An enforcement layer applies explicit risk policy at runtime, and a governance MAS supervises the Oracle through auditing, uncertainty-driven verification, and versioned refinement. The central engineering principle is patch locality: many newly observed safety failures can be mitigated by updating the governed oracle artifact and its release pipeline rather than retracting or retraining the underlying decision component. The architecture is implementation-agnostic with respect to both the Proposer and the Safety Oracle, and specifies the roles, artifacts, protocols, and release semantics needed for runtime gating, audit intake, signed patching, and staged rollout across distributed deployments. The result is a hybrid MAS engineering framework for integrating highly capable but fallible autonomous systems under explicit, version-controlled, and auditable oversight.

Elias Malomgré, Pieter Simoens

AI alignment is growing in importance, yet current approaches suffer from a critical structural flaw that entangles the safety objectives with the agent's policy. Methods such as Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback and Direct Preference Optimization create opaque, single-use alignment artifacts, which we term Alignment Waste. We propose Interactionless Inverse Reinforcement Learning to decouple alignment artifact learning from policy optimization, producing an inspectable, editable, and model-agnostic reward model. Additionally, we introduce the Alignment Flywheel, a human-in-the-loop lifecycle that iteratively hardens the reward model through automated audits and refinement. This architecture transforms safety from a disposable expense into a durable, verifiable engineering asset.

Elias Malomgré, Pieter Simoens

Recent trends in Reinforcement Learning (RL) highlight the need for agents to learn from reward-free interactions and alternative supervision signals, such as unlabeled or incomplete demonstrations, rather than relying solely on explicit reward maximization. Additionally, developing generalist agents that can adapt efficiently in real-world environments often requires leveraging these reward-free signals to guide learning and behavior. However, while intrinsic motivation techniques provide a means for agents to seek out novel or uncertain states in the absence of explicit rewards, they are often challenged by dense reward environments or the complexity of high-dimensional state and action spaces. Furthermore, most existing approaches rely directly on the unprocessed intrinsic reward signals, which can make it difficult to shape or control the agent's exploration effectively. We propose a framework that can effectively utilize expert demonstrations, even when they are incomplete and imperfect. By applying a mapping function to transform the similarity between an agent's state and expert data into a shaped intrinsic reward, our method allows for flexible and targeted exploration of expert-like behaviors. We employ a Mixture of Autoencoder Experts to capture a diverse range of behaviors and accommodate missing information in demonstrations. Experiments show our approach enables robust exploration and strong performance in both sparse and dense reward environments, even when demonstrations are sparse or incomplete. This provides a practical framework for RL in realistic settings where optimal data is unavailable and precise reward control is needed.