Ali Sekmen

LG
h-index9
3papers
49citations
Novelty33%
AI Score20

3 Papers

8.7LGDec 28, 2022
Effectiveness of Deep Image Embedding Clustering Methods on Tabular Data

Sakib Abrar, Ali Sekmen, Manar D. Samad

Deep learning methods in the literature are commonly benchmarked on image data sets, which may not be suitable or effective baselines for non-image tabular data. In this paper, we take a data-centric view to perform one of the first studies on deep embedding clustering of tabular data. Eight clustering and state-of-the-art embedding clustering methods proposed for image data sets are tested on seven tabular data sets. Our results reveal that a traditional clustering method ranks second out of eight methods and is superior to most deep embedding clustering baselines. Our observation aligns with the literature that conventional machine learning of tabular data is still a robust approach against deep learning. Therefore, state-of-the-art embedding clustering methods should consider data-centric customization of learning architectures to become competitive baselines for tabular data.

1.2NAJul 21, 2014
Deterministic Versus Randomized Kaczmarz Iterative Projection

Tim Wallace, Ali Sekmen

Kaczmarz's alternating projection method has been widely used for solving a consistent (mostly over-determined) linear system of equations Ax=b. Because of its simple iterative nature with light computation, this method was successfully applied in computerized tomography. Since tomography generates a matrix A with highly coherent rows, randomized Kaczmarz algorithm is expected to provide faster convergence as it picks a row for each iteration at random, based on a certain probability distribution. It was recently shown that picking a row at random, proportional with its norm, makes the iteration converge exponentially in expectation with a decay constant that depends on the scaled condition number of A and not the number of equations. Since Kaczmarz's method is a subspace projection method, the convergence rate for simple Kaczmarz algorithm was developed in terms of subspace angles. This paper provides analyses of simple and randomized Kaczmarz algorithms and explain the link between them. It also propose new versions of randomization that may speed up convergence.

4.8LGNov 11, 2017
CUR Decompositions, Similarity Matrices, and Subspace Clustering

Akram Aldroubi, Keaton Hamm, Ahmet Bugra Koku et al.

A general framework for solving the subspace clustering problem using the CUR decomposition is presented. The CUR decomposition provides a natural way to construct similarity matrices for data that come from a union of unknown subspaces $\mathscr{U}=\underset{i=1}{\overset{M}\bigcup}S_i$. The similarity matrices thus constructed give the exact clustering in the noise-free case. Additionally, this decomposition gives rise to many distinct similarity matrices from a given set of data, which allow enough flexibility to perform accurate clustering of noisy data. We also show that two known methods for subspace clustering can be derived from the CUR decomposition. An algorithm based on the theoretical construction of similarity matrices is presented, and experiments on synthetic and real data are presented to test the method. Additionally, an adaptation of our CUR based similarity matrices is utilized to provide a heuristic algorithm for subspace clustering; this algorithm yields the best overall performance to date for clustering the Hopkins155 motion segmentation dataset.