Debmalya Panigrahi

Keerti Anand, Rong Ge, Amit Kumar et al.

This paper studies online algorithms augmented with multiple machine-learned predictions. While online algorithms augmented with a single prediction have been extensively studied in recent years, the literature for the multiple predictions setting is sparse. In this paper, we give a generic algorithmic framework for online covering problems with multiple predictions that obtains an online solution that is competitive against the performance of the best predictor. Our algorithm incorporates the use of predictions in the classic potential-based analysis of online algorithms. We apply our algorithmic framework to solve classical problems such as online set cover, (weighted) caching, and online facility location in the multiple predictions setting. Our algorithm can also be robustified, i.e., the algorithm can be simultaneously made competitive against the best prediction and the performance of the best online algorithm (without prediction).

Keerti Anand, Rong Ge, Debmalya Panigrahi

A popular line of recent research incorporates ML advice in the design of online algorithms to improve their performance in typical instances. These papers treat the ML algorithm as a black-box, and redesign online algorithms to take advantage of ML predictions. In this paper, we ask the complementary question: can we redesign ML algorithms to provide better predictions for online algorithms? We explore this question in the context of the classic rent-or-buy problem, and show that incorporating optimization benchmarks in ML loss functions leads to significantly better performance, while maintaining a worst-case adversarial result when the advice is completely wrong. We support this finding both through theoretical bounds and numerical simulations.

Keerti Anand, Rong Ge, Amit Kumar et al.

The emerging field of learning-augmented online algorithms uses ML techniques to predict future input parameters and thereby improve the performance of online algorithms. Since these parameters are, in general, real-valued functions, a natural approach is to use regression techniques to make these predictions. We introduce this approach in this paper, and explore it in the context of a general online search framework that captures classic problems like (generalized) ski rental, bin packing, minimum makespan scheduling, etc. We show nearly tight bounds on the sample complexity of this regression problem, and extend our results to the agnostic setting. From a technical standpoint, we show that the key is to incorporate online optimization benchmarks in the design of the loss function for the regression problem, thereby diverging from the use of off-the-shelf regression tools with standard bounds on statistical error.

Jan van den Brand, Inge Li Gørtz, Chirag Pabbaraju et al.

The goal in the stochastic vertex cover problem is to obtain an approximately minimum vertex cover for a graph $G^\star$ that is realized by sampling each edge independently with some probability $p\in (0, 1]$ in a base graph $G = (V, E)$. The algorithm is given the base graph $G$ and the probability $p$ as inputs, but its only access to the realized graph $G^\star$ is through queries on individual edges in $G$ that reveal the existence (or not) of the queried edge in $G^\star$. In this paper, we resolve the central open question for this problem: to find a $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximate vertex cover using only $O_\varepsilon(n/p)$ edge queries. Prior to our work, there were two incomparable state-of-the-art results for this problem: a $(3/2+\varepsilon)$-approximation using $O_\varepsilon(n/p)$ queries (Derakhshan, Durvasula, and Haghtalab, 2023) and a $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximation using $O_\varepsilon((n/p)\cdot \mathrm{RS}(n))$ queries (Derakhshan, Saneian, and Xun, 2025), where $\mathrm{RS}(n)$ is known to be at least $2^{Ω\left(\frac{\log n}{\log \log n}\right)}$ and could be as large as $\frac{n}{2^{Θ(\log^* n)}}$. Our improved upper bound of $O_{\varepsilon}(n/p)$ matches the known lower bound of $Ω(n/p)$ for any constant-factor approximation algorithm for this problem (Behnezhad, Blum, and Derakhshan, 2022). A key tool in our result is a new concentration bound for the size of minimum vertex cover on random graphs, which might be of independent interest.

Anish Hebbar, Rong Ge, Amit Kumar et al.

The field of learning-augmented algorithms seeks to use ML techniques on past instances of a problem to inform an algorithm designed for a future instance. In this paper, we introduce a novel model for learning-augmented algorithms inspired by online learning. In this model, we are given a sequence of instances of a problem and the goal of the learning-augmented algorithm is to use prior instances to propose a solution to a future instance of the problem. The performance of the algorithm is measured by its average performance across all the instances, where the performance on a single instance is the ratio between the cost of the algorithm's solution and that of an optimal solution for that instance. We apply this framework to the classic $k$-median clustering problem, and give an efficient learning algorithm that can approximately match the average performance of the best fixed $k$-median solution in hindsight across all the instances. We also experimentally evaluate our algorithm and show that its empirical performance is close to optimal, and also that it automatically adapts the solution to a dynamically changing sequence.

Yannan Bai, Debmalya Panigrahi, Ian Zhang

Kleinberg and Mullainathan (2024) recently proposed a formal framework called language generation in the limit and showed that given a sequence of example strings from an unknown target language drawn from any countable collection, an algorithm can correctly generate unseen strings from the target language within finite time. This notion was further refined by Li, Raman, and Tewari (2024), who defined stricter categories of non-uniform and uniform generation. They showed that a finite union of uniformly generatable collections is generatable in the limit, and asked if the same is true for non-uniform generation. We begin by resolving the question in the negative: we give a uniformly generatable collection and a non-uniformly generatable collection whose union is not generatable in the limit. We then use facets of this construction to further our understanding of several variants of language generation. The first two, generation with noise and without samples, were introduced by Raman and Raman (2025) and Li, Raman, and Tewari (2024) respectively. We show the equivalence of these models for uniform and non-uniform generation, and provide a characterization of non-uniform noisy generation. The former paper asked if there is any separation between noisy and non-noisy generation in the limit -- we show that such a separation exists even with a single noisy string. Finally, we study the framework of generation with feedback, introduced by Charikar and Pabbaraju (2025), where the algorithm is strengthened by allowing it to ask membership queries. We show finite queries add no power, but infinite queries yield a strictly more powerful model. In summary, the results in this paper resolve the union-closedness of language generation in the limit, and leverage those techniques (and others) to give precise characterizations for natural variants that incorporate noise, loss, and feedback.