Lorenzo Benetollo

Dalila Ressi, Alvise Spanò, Lorenzo Benetollo et al.

Smart contracts are central to a myriad of critical blockchain applications, from financial transactions to supply chain management. However, their adoption is hindered by security vulnerabilities that can result in significant financial losses. Most vulnerability detection tools and methods available nowadays leverage either static analysis methods or machine learning. Unfortunately, as valuable as they are, both approaches suffer from limitations that make them only partially effective. In this survey, we analyze the state of the art in machine-learning vulnerability detection for Ethereum smart contracts, by categorizing existing tools and methodologies, evaluating them, and highlighting their limitations. Our critical assessment unveils issues such as restricted vulnerability coverage and dataset construction flaws, providing us with new metrics to overcome the difficulties that restrain a sound comparison of existing solutions. Driven by our findings, we discuss best practices to enhance the accuracy, scope, and efficiency of vulnerability detection in smart contracts. Our guidelines address the known flaws while at the same time opening new avenues for research and development. By shedding light on current challenges and offering novel directions for improvement, we contribute to the advancement of secure smart contract development and blockchain technology as a whole.

Dalila Ressi, Alvise Spanò, Matteo Rizzo et al.

Reentrancy remains one of the most critical classes of vulnerabilities in Ethereum smart contracts, yet widely used detection tools and datasets continue to reflect outdated patterns and obsolete Solidity versions. This paper adopts a dependability-oriented perspective on reentrancy detection in Solidity 0.8+, assessing how reliably state-of-the-art static analyzers and AI-based techniques operate on modern code by putting them to the test on two fronts. We construct two manually verified benchmarks: an Aggregated Benchmark of 432 real-world contracts, consolidated and relabeled from prior datasets, and a Reentrancy Scenarios Dataset (RSD) of \chadded{143} handcrafted minimal working examples designed to isolate and stress-test individual reentrancy patterns. We then evaluate 12 formal-methods-based tools, 10 machine-learning models, and 9 large language models. On the Aggregated Benchmark, traditional tools and ML models achieve up to 0.87 F1, while the best LLMs reach 0.96 in a zero-shot setting. On the RSD, most tools fail on multiple scenarios, the top performer achieving an F1 of 0.76, whereas the strongest model attains 0.82. Overall, our results indicate that leading LLMs outperform the majority of existing detectors, highlighting concerning gaps in the robustness and maintainability of current reentrancy-analysis tools.