Luuk Jacobs

Luuk Jacobs, Mohammad Ali Javidian

Multi-Source Bayesian Optimization (MSBO) serves as a variant of the traditional Bayesian Optimization (BO) framework applicable to situations involving optimization of an objective black-box function over multiple information sources such as simulations, surrogate models, or real-world experiments. However, traditional MSBO assumes the input variables of the objective function to be independent and identically distributed, limiting its effectiveness in scenarios where causal information is available and interventions can be performed, such as clinical trials or policy-making. In the single-source domain, Causal Bayesian Optimization (CBO) extends standard BO with the principles of causality, enabling better modeling of variable dependencies. This leads to more accurate optimization, improved decision-making, and more efficient use of low-cost information sources. In this article, we propose a principled integration of the MSBO and CBO methodologies in the multi-source domain, leveraging the strengths of both to enhance optimization efficiency and reduce computational complexity in higher-dimensional problems. We present the theoretical foundations of both Causal and Multi-Source Bayesian Optimization, and demonstrate how their synergy informs our Multi-Source Causal Bayesian Optimization (MSCBO) algorithm. We compare the performance of MSCBO against its foundational counterparts for both synthetic and real-world datasets with varying levels of noise, highlighting the robustness and applicability of MSCBO. Based on our findings, we conclude that integrating MSBO with the causality principles of CBO facilitates dimensionality reduction and lowers operational costs, ultimately improving convergence speed, performance, and scalability.

Kyriakos Flouris, Moritz Halter, Yolanne Y. R. Lee et al.

Hemodynamic analysis is essential for predicting aneurysm rupture and guiding treatment. While magnetic resonance flow imaging enables time-resolved volumetric blood velocity measurements, its low spatiotemporal resolution and signal-to-noise ratio limit its diagnostic utility. To address this, we propose the Localized Fourier Neural Operator (LoFNO), a novel 3D architecture that enhances both spatial and temporal resolution with the ability to predict wall shear stress (WSS) directly from clinical imaging data. LoFNO integrates Laplacian eigenvectors as geometric priors for improved structural awareness on irregular, unseen geometries and employs an Enhanced Deep Super-Resolution Network (EDSR) layer for robust upsampling. By combining geometric priors with neural operator frameworks, LoFNO de-noises and spatiotemporally upsamples flow data, achieving superior velocity and WSS predictions compared to interpolation and alternative deep learning methods, enabling more precise cerebrovascular diagnostics.

Luuk Jacobs, Stefano Mandija, Hongyan Liu et al.

In this study, we develop a physics-informed deep learning-based method to synthesize multiple brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrasts from a single five-minute acquisition and investigate its ability to generalize to arbitrary contrasts to accelerate neuroimaging protocols. A dataset of fifty-five subjects acquired with a standard MRI protocol and a five-minute transient-state sequence was used to develop a physics-informed deep learning-based method. The model, based on a generative adversarial network, maps data acquired from the five-minute scan to "effective" quantitative parameter maps, here named q*-maps, by using its generated PD, T1, and T2 values in a signal model to synthesize four standard contrasts (proton density-weighted, T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery), from which losses are computed. The q*-maps are compared to literature values and the synthetic contrasts are compared to an end-to-end deep learning-based method proposed by literature. The generalizability of the proposed method is investigated for five volunteers by synthesizing three non-standard contrasts unseen during training and comparing these to respective ground truth acquisitions via contrast-to-noise ratio and quantitative assessment. The physics-informed method was able to match the high-quality synthMRI of the end-to-end method for the four standard contrasts, with mean \pm standard deviation structural similarity metrics above 0.75 \pm 0.08 and peak signal-to-noise ratios above 22.4 \pm 1.9 and 22.6 \pm 2.1. Additionally, the physics-informed method provided retrospective contrast adjustment, with visually similar signal contrast and comparable contrast-to-noise ratios to the ground truth acquisitions for three sequences unused for model training, demonstrating its generalizability and potential application to accelerate neuroimaging protocols.