Claire R. Leibowicz

Emily Saltz, Claire R. Leibowicz

AI chatbots already function as de facto mental health support tools for millions of people, including people in crisis. Yet, they lack the clinical validation, shared standards, and coordinated oversight that their societal role demands. This primer was developed in conjunction with a multistakeholder workshop hosted by Partnership on AI in 2026, convening AI labs, mental health practitioners, people with lived experience, and policymakers, to provide a common cross-sector reference point for the current state of the field of AI and suicide prevention. It begins with an overview of clinical best practices, then turns to how frontier AI systems (as of winter 2026) detect and respond to suicide and non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) queries. Together, these provide insight into what it would take to design and implement AI tools that not only better prevent suicide and NSSI, but also promote overall well-being. Drawing on clinical literature, publicly available AI lab policies, an emerging landscape of evaluation frameworks, and conversations with leaders across the AI and mental health fields, we map challenges posed by general-purpose AI chatbots for mental health across model, product, and policy layers, ultimately highlighting priority areas where cross-industry alignment is both urgently needed and achievable.

Claire R. Leibowicz

As synthetic media proliferates, AI policymakers and practitioners have increasingly turned to disclosures--signals describing how media has been created or modified by AI--to help audiences evaluate media credibility. While there is a growing body of research on user interpretations, the upstream decision-making processes that affect users remain underexplored. This study therefore examines how AI policymakers and practitioners design synthetic media disclosures under complex sociotechnical constraints. Drawing on 23 expert interviews and 13 case studies from organizations participating in the Partnership on AI's Synthetic Media Framework, analysis identifies key disclosure goals, including process transparency and harm reduction, and two central tensions that emerge when pursuing those goals: normativity versus neutrality and proactivity versus precision. Findings highlight the role of analogical reasoning, from nutrition labels to Prop 65 warnings, in managing, but not resolving tensions. Ultimately, this study emphasizes the need for scholarship focused on AI transparency decision-makers and their use of analogical reasoning to support audiences encountering media in the AI age.

Claire R. Leibowicz, Christian H. Cardona

2023 was the year the world woke up to generative AI, and 2024 is the year policymakers are responding more firmly. Importantly, this policy momentum is taking place alongside real world creation and distribution of synthetic media. Social media platforms, news organizations, dating apps, image generation companies, and more are already navigating a world of AI-generated visuals and sounds, already changing hearts and minds, as policymakers try to catch up. How, then, can AI governance capture the complexity of the synthetic media landscape? How can it attend to synthetic media's myriad uses, ranging from storytelling to privacy preservation, to deception, fraud, and defamation, taking into account the many stakeholders involved in its development, creation, and distribution? And what might it mean to govern synthetic media in a manner that upholds the truth while bolstering freedom of expression? What follows is the first known collection of diverse examples of the implementation of synthetic media governance that responds to these questions, specifically through Partnership on AI's (PAI) Responsible Practices for Synthetic Media - a voluntary, normative Framework for creating, distributing, and building technology for synthetic media responsibly, launched in February 2023. In this paper, we present a case bank of real world examples that help operationalize the Framework - highlighting areas synthetic media governance can be applied, augmented, expanded, and refined for use, in practice. Read together, the cases emphasize distinct elements of AI policymaking and seven emergent best practices supporting transparency, safety, expression, and digital dignity online: consent, disclosure, and differentiation between harmful and creative use cases.