Qinshi Zhang

HC
3papers
2citations
Novelty52%
AI Score41

3 Papers

HCJul 16, 2024
Frontend Diffusion: Exploring Intent-Based User Interfaces through Abstract-to-Detailed Task Transitions

Qinshi Zhang, Latisha Besariani Hendra, Mohan Chi et al.

The emergence of Generative AI is catalyzing a paradigm shift in user interfaces from command-based to intent-based outcome specification. In this paper, we explore abstract-to-detailed task transitions in the context of frontend code generation as a step towards intent-based user interfaces, aiming to bridge the gap between abstract user intentions and concrete implementations. We introduce Frontend Diffusion, an end-to-end LLM-powered tool that generates high-quality websites from user sketches. The system employs a three-stage task transition process: sketching, writing, and coding. We demonstrate the potential of task transitions to reduce human intervention and communication costs in complex tasks. Our work also opens avenues for exploring similar approaches in other domains, potentially extending to more complex, interdependent tasks such as video production.

AIMay 7
AGWM: Affordance-Grounded World Models for Environments with Compositional Prerequisites

Qinshi Zhang, Weipeng Deng, Zhihan Jiang et al.

In model-based learning, the agent learns behaviors by simulating trajectories based on world model predictions. Standard world models typically learn a stationary transition function that maps states and actions to next states, when an action and an outcome frequently co-occur in training data, the model tends to internalize this correlation as a general causal rule while ignoring action preconditions. In interactive environments, however, agent actions can reshape the future affordance space. At each timestep, an action may becomes executable only after its prerequisites are met, or non-executable when they are destroyed. We term such events structure-changing events (SC events). As a result, a conventional world model often fails to determine whether a given action is executable in the current state, especially in multi-step predictions. Each imagined step is conditioned on an incorrect affordance state, and therefore the prediction error compounds over the rollout horizon. In this paper, we propose AGWM (Affordance-Grounded World Model), which learns an abstract affordance structure represented as a DAG of prerequisite dependencies to explicitly track the dynamic executability of actions. Experiments on game-based simulated environments demonstrate the effectiveness of our method by achieving lower multi-step prediction error, better generalization to novel configurations, and improved interpretability.

HCApr 8
Mixed-Initiative Context: Structuring and Managing Context for Human-AI Collaboration

Haichang Li, Qinshi Zhang, Piaohong Wang et al.

In the human-AI collaboration area, the context formed naturally through multi-turn interactions is typically flattened into a chronological sequence and treated as a fixed whole in subsequent reasoning, with no mechanism for dynamic organization and management along the collaboration workflow. Yet these contexts differ substantially in lifecycle, structural hierarchy, and relevance. For instance, temporary or abandoned exchanges and parallel topic threads persist in the limited context window, causing interference and even conflict. Meanwhile, users are largely limited to influencing context indirectly through input modifications (e.g., corrections, references, or ignoring), leaving their control neither explicit nor verifiable. To address this, we propose Mixed-Initiative Context, which reconceptualizes the context formed across multi-turn interactions as an explicit, structured, and manipulable interactive object. Under this concept, the structure, scope, and content of context can be dynamically organized and adjusted according to task needs, enabling both humans and AI to actively participate in context construction and regulation. To explore this concept, we implement Contextify as a probe system and conduct a user study examining users' context management behaviors, attitudes toward AI initiative, and overall collaboration experience. We conclude by discussing the implications of this concept for the HCI community.