Aishani Pathak

2papers

2 Papers

CVJul 7, 2024
Leveraging Topological Guidance for Improved Knowledge Distillation

Eun Som Jeon, Rahul Khurana, Aishani Pathak et al.

Deep learning has shown its efficacy in extracting useful features to solve various computer vision tasks. However, when the structure of the data is complex and noisy, capturing effective information to improve performance is very difficult. To this end, topological data analysis (TDA) has been utilized to derive useful representations that can contribute to improving performance and robustness against perturbations. Despite its effectiveness, the requirements for large computational resources and significant time consumption in extracting topological features through TDA are critical problems when implementing it on small devices. To address this issue, we propose a framework called Topological Guidance-based Knowledge Distillation (TGD), which uses topological features in knowledge distillation (KD) for image classification tasks. We utilize KD to train a superior lightweight model and provide topological features with multiple teachers simultaneously. We introduce a mechanism for integrating features from different teachers and reducing the knowledge gap between teachers and the student, which aids in improving performance. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach through diverse empirical evaluations.

40.2CVApr 30
Adaptive Geodesic Conformal Prediction for Egocentric Camera Pose Estimation

Aishani Pathak, Hasti Seifi

Egocentric pose estimation for Augmented Reality (AR) and assistive devices requires not just accurate predictions but guaranteed uncertainty regions. Conformal prediction (CP) provides such guarantees without retraining, but we show that standard CP with a single fixed threshold achieves nominal 90% overall coverage while covering only ~60% of the hardest 25% of frames (Q4) -- a ~30 percentage-point conditional coverage gap consistent across 12 participants, 3 predictors, and 3 horizons (108 evaluations) on EPIC-Fields. We further show that a geodesic SE(3) nonconformity score identifies physically harder frames than Euclidean scoring, with only 15-26% Q4 overlap and 2-3x higher ground-truth camera displacement for geodesic Q4 frames. To close the coverage gap, we propose DINOv2-Bridge adaptive CP: a two-stage difficulty estimator trained on a single source participant that transfers cross-participant without any images at test time, improving Q4 coverage from ~0.75 to ~0.93 while maintaining overall coverage at the 90% target.