Maria Margarida Mascarenhas

Maria Margarida Mascarenhas, Hussain Kazmi

The field of electricity price forecasting has seen significant advances in the last years, including the development of new, more accurate forecast models. These models leverage statistical relationships in previously observed data to predict the future; however, there is a lack of analysis explaining these models, which limits their real world applicability in critical infrastructure. In this paper, using data from the Belgian electricity markets, we explore a state-of-the-art forecasting model to understand if its predictions can be trusted in more general settings than the limited context it is trained in. If the model produces poor predictions in extreme conditions or if its predictions are inconsistent with reality, it cannot be relied upon in real-world where these forecasts are used in downstream decision-making activities. Our results show that, despite being largely accurate enough in general, even state of the art forecasts struggle with remaining consistent with reality.

Arnaud Verstraeten, Maria Margarida Mascarenhas, Hussain Kazmi

Renewable electricity generation has grown significantly across many European power systems, leading to a greener energy mix, but also additional complexity in balancing electricity supply and demand. Unexpected differences between forecasts and actual output can lead to fluctuations in the system imbalance, which causes volatile imbalance prices. Accurate imbalance price forecasts are crucial for market players to choose a strategic balancing position. In early works, most forecasting methods combined fundamental and statistical approaches, but currently there is a clear trend towards data-driven machine learning models. This review compares forecasting algorithms in European markets with a focus on methodology. We emphasize the importance of high-quality input data, including intraday information and per-minute system data. Next, we identify the need for a common benchmark to compare novel forecasting methods developed for different markets and time periods. Finally, we argue that forecasts should be evaluated in terms of both downstream value and accuracy.

Chi Bui, Maria Margarida Mascarenhas, Arnaud Verstraeten et al.

Recent advances in Time Series Foundation Models (TSFMs) promise zero-shot forecasting capabilities with minimal task-specific training. While these models have shown strong performance across generic benchmarks, their applicability in volatile, complex electricity markets remains underexplored. Addressing this gap, this study provides a systematic empirical evaluation of several TSFMs, specifically Chronos-2 and Chronos-Bolt (developed by Amazon), and TimesFM 2.5 (provided by Google), for forecasting Belgian day-ahead and imbalance electricity prices. For both considered markets, Chronos-2 in ARX mode produces the most accurate forecasts. Compared with the best ensemble prediction from other machine learning methods, Chronos-2's Mean Absolute Error (MAE) is 5% lower for the day-ahead market. In contrast, the model yields 10% higher MAE predicting imbalance prices across all forecast horizons, except for the two-hour-ahead horizon. Moreover, we find that TSFMs exhibit genuine zero-shot forecasting skills but still struggle under extreme market conditions.

Maria Margarida Mascarenhas, Jilles De Blauwe, Mikael Amelin et al.

Accurate short-term electricity price forecasting is crucial for strategically scheduling demand and generation bids in day-ahead markets. While data-driven techniques have shown considerable prowess in achieving high forecast accuracy in recent years, they rely heavily on the quality of input covariates. In this paper, we investigate whether asynchronously published prices as a result of differing gate closure times (GCTs) in some bidding zones can improve forecasting accuracy in other markets with later GCTs. Using a state-of-the-art ensemble of models, we show significant improvements of 22% and 9% in forecast accuracy in the Belgian (BE) and Swedish bidding zones (SE3) respectively, when including price data from interconnected markets with earlier GCT (Germany-Luxembourg, Austria, and Switzerland). This improvement holds for both general as well as extreme market conditions. Our analysis also yields further important insights: frequent model recalibration is necessary for maximum accuracy but comes at substantial additional computational costs, and using data from more markets does not always lead to better performance - a fact we delve deeper into with interpretability analysis of the forecast models. Overall, these findings provide valuable guidance for market participants and decision-makers aiming to optimize bidding strategies within increasingly interconnected and volatile European energy markets.