19.2IVJun 16, 2023
Neural Volumetric Reconstruction for Coherent Synthetic Aperture SonarAlbert W. Reed, Juhyeon Kim, Thomas Blanford et al.
Synthetic aperture sonar (SAS) measures a scene from multiple views in order to increase the resolution of reconstructed imagery. Image reconstruction methods for SAS coherently combine measurements to focus acoustic energy onto the scene. However, image formation is typically under-constrained due to a limited number of measurements and bandlimited hardware, which limits the capabilities of existing reconstruction methods. To help meet these challenges, we design an analysis-by-synthesis optimization that leverages recent advances in neural rendering to perform coherent SAS imaging. Our optimization enables us to incorporate physics-based constraints and scene priors into the image formation process. We validate our method on simulation and experimental results captured in both air and water. We demonstrate both quantitatively and qualitatively that our method typically produces superior reconstructions than existing approaches. We share code and data for reproducibility.
8.0CVDec 16, 2021
Implicit Neural Representations for Deconvolving SAS ImagesAlbert Reed, Thomas Blanford, Daniel C. Brown et al.
Synthetic aperture sonar (SAS) image resolution is constrained by waveform bandwidth and array geometry. Specifically, the waveform bandwidth determines a point spread function (PSF) that blurs the locations of point scatterers in the scene. In theory, deconvolving the reconstructed SAS image with the scene PSF restores the original distribution of scatterers and yields sharper reconstructions. However, deconvolution is an ill-posed operation that is highly sensitive to noise. In this work, we leverage implicit neural representations (INRs), shown to be strong priors for the natural image space, to deconvolve SAS images. Importantly, our method does not require training data, as we perform our deconvolution through an analysis-bysynthesis optimization in a self-supervised fashion. We validate our method on simulated SAS data created with a point scattering model and real data captured with an in-air circular SAS. This work is an important first step towards applying neural networks for SAS image deconvolution.
1.7CVAug 15, 2018
Measuring Human Assessed Complexity in Synthetic Aperture Sonar Imagery Using the Elo Rating SystemBrian Reinhardt, Isaac Gerg, Daniel Brown et al.
Performance of automatic target recognition from synthetic aperture sonar data is heavily dependent on the complexity of the beamformed imagery. Several mechanisms can contribute to this, including unwanted vehicle dynamics, the bathymetry of the scene, and the presence of natural and manmade clutter. To understand the impact of the environmental complexity on image perception, researchers have taken approaches rooted in information theory, or heuristics. Despite these efforts, a quantitative measure for complexity has not been related to the phenomenology from which it is derived. By using subject matter experts (SMEs) we derive a complexity metric for a set of imagery which accounts for the underlying phenomenology. The goal of this work is to develop an understanding of how several common information theoretic and heuristic measures are related to the SME perceived complexity in synthetic aperture sonar imagery. To achieve this, an ensemble of 10-meter x 10-meter images were cropped from a high-frequency SAS data set that spans multiple environments. The SME's were presented pairs of images from which they could rate the relative image complexity. These comparisons were then converted into the desired sequential ranking using a method first developed by A. Elo for establishing rankings of chess players. The Elo method produced a plausible rank ordering across the broad dataset. The heuristic and information theoretical metrics were then compared to the image rank from which they were derived. The metrics with the highest degree of correlation were those relating to spatial information, e.g. variations in pixel intensity, with an R-squared value of approximately 0.9. However, this agreement was dependent on the scale from which the spatial variation was measured. Results will also be presented for many other measures including lacunarity, image compression, and entropy.