Peter Munch

2papers

2 Papers

CVAug 21, 2024
Fairness measures for biometric quality assessment

André Dörsch, Torsten Schlett, Peter Munch et al.

Quality assessment algorithms measure the quality of a captured biometric sample. Since the sample quality strongly affects the recognition performance of a biometric system, it is essential to only process samples of sufficient quality and discard samples of low-quality. Even though quality assessment algorithms are not intended to yield very different quality scores across demographic groups, quality score discrepancies are possible, resulting in different discard ratios. To ensure that quality assessment algorithms do not take demographic characteristics into account when assessing sample quality and consequently to ensure that the quality algorithms perform equally for all individuals, it is crucial to develop a fairness measure. In this work we propose and compare multiple fairness measures for evaluating quality components across demographic groups. Proposed measures, could be used as potential candidates for an upcoming standard in this important field.

34.0NAMar 31
Solving the (Navier-)Stokes equations with space and time adaptivity using deal.II

Peter Munch, Marc Fehling, Martin Kronbichler et al.

In this article, we solve the Stokes and Navier-Stokes equations with the deal$.$II finite-element library. In particular, we use its multigrid, adaptive-mesh, and matrix-free infrastructures to design efficient linear and nonlinear iterative solvers, respectively. We solve the stationary Stokes equations on hp-adaptive meshes with a hp-multigrid approach, the transient Stokes equations with space-time finite elements and space-time multigrid, and, finally, the stabilized incompressible Navier-Stokes equations on locally refined meshes with a monolithic multigrid solver. The selected examples underline the flexibility and modularity of the multigrid infrastructure of deal$.$II.