M. Wiśniewski

Mariusz Wisniewski, Zeeshan A. Rana, Ivan Petrunin et al.

Drone detection has benefited from improvements in deep neural networks, but like many other applications, suffers from the availability of accurate data for training. Synthetic data provides a potential for low-cost data generation and has been shown to improve data availability and quality. However, models trained on synthetic datasets need to prove their ability to perform on real-world data, known as the problem of sim-to-real transferability. Here, we present a drone detection Faster-RCNN model trained on a purely synthetic dataset that transfers to real-world data. We found that it achieves an AP_50 of 97.0% when evaluated on the MAV-Vid - a real dataset of flying drones - compared with 97.8% for an equivalent model trained on real-world data. Our results show that using synthetic data for drone detection has the potential to reduce data collection costs and improve labelling quality. These findings could be a starting point for more elaborate synthetic drone datasets. For example, realistic recreations of specific scenarios could de-risk the dataset generation of safety-critical applications such as the detection of drones at airports. Further, synthetic data may enable reliable drone detection systems, which could benefit other areas, such as unmanned traffic management systems. The code is available https://github.com/mazqtpopx/cranfield-synthetic-drone-detection alongside the datasets https://huggingface.co/datasets/mazqtpopx/cranfield-synthetic-drone-detection.

Mariusz Wisniewski, Paraskevas Chatzithanos, Weisi Guo et al.

Deep Reinforcement learning (DRL) is used to enable autonomous navigation in unknown environments. Most research assume perfect sensor data, but real-world environments may contain natural and artificial sensor noise and denial. Here, we present a benchmark of both well-used and emerging DRL algorithms in a navigation task with configurable sensor denial effects. In particular, we are interested in comparing how different DRL methods (e.g. model-free PPO vs. model-based DreamerV3) are affected by sensor denial. We show that DreamerV3 outperforms other methods in the visual end-to-end navigation task with a dynamic goal - and other methods are not able to learn this. Furthermore, DreamerV3 generally outperforms other methods in sensor-denied environments. In order to improve robustness, we use adversarial training and demonstrate an improved performance in denied environments, although this generally comes with a performance cost on the vanilla environments. We anticipate this benchmark of different DRL methods and the usage of adversarial training to be a starting point for the development of more elaborate navigation strategies that are capable of dealing with uncertain and denied sensor readings.

Mariusz Wiśniewski, Loris Giulivi, Giacomo Boracchi

For more than a decade, deep learning models have been dominating in various 2D imaging tasks. Their application is now extending to 3D imaging, with 3D Convolutional Neural Networks (3D CNNs) being able to process LIDAR, MRI, and CT scans, with significant implications for fields such as autonomous driving and medical imaging. In these critical settings, explaining the model's decisions is fundamental. Despite recent advances in Explainable Artificial Intelligence, however, little effort has been devoted to explaining 3D CNNs, and many works explain these models via inadequate extensions of 2D saliency methods. A fundamental limitation to the development of 3D saliency methods is the lack of a benchmark to quantitatively assess these on 3D data. To address this issue, we propose SE3D: a framework for Saliency method Evaluation in 3D imaging. We propose modifications to ShapeNet, ScanNet, and BraTS datasets, and evaluation metrics to assess saliency methods for 3D CNNs. We evaluate both state-of-the-art saliency methods designed for 3D data and extensions of popular 2D saliency methods to 3D. Our experiments show that 3D saliency methods do not provide explanations of sufficient quality, and that there is margin for future improvements and safer applications of 3D CNNs in critical fields.