Elisa Tosello

RO
5papers
42citations
Novelty40%
AI Score38

5 Papers

ROAug 11, 2024Code
A Meta-Engine Framework for Interleaved Task and Motion Planning using Topological Refinements

Elisa Tosello, Alessandro Valentini, Andrea Micheli

Task And Motion Planning (TAMP) is the problem of finding a solution to an automated planning problem that includes discrete actions executable by low-level continuous motions. This field is gaining increasing interest within the robotics community, as it significantly enhances robot's autonomy in real-world applications. Many solutions and formulations exist, but no clear standard representation has emerged. In this paper, we propose a general and open-source framework for modeling and benchmarking TAMP problems. Moreover, we introduce an innovative meta-technique to solve TAMP problems involving moving agents and multiple task-state-dependent obstacles. This approach enables using any off-the-shelf task planner and motion planner while leveraging a geometric analysis of the motion planner's search space to prune the task planner's exploration, enhancing its efficiency. We also show how to specialize this meta-engine for the case of an incremental SMT-based planner. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach across benchmark problems of increasing complexity, where robots must navigate environments with movable obstacles. Finally, we integrate state-of-the-art TAMP algorithms into our framework and compare their performance with our achievements.

22.2ROMar 11
Interleaving Scheduling and Motion Planning with Incremental Learning of Symbolic Space-Time Motion Abstractions

Elisa Tosello, Arthur Bit-Monnot, Davide Lusuardi et al.

Task and Motion Planning combines high-level task sequencing (what to do) with low-level motion planning (how to do it) to generate feasible, collision-free execution plans. However, in many real-world domains, such as automated warehouses, tasks are predefined, shifting the challenge to if, when, and how to execute them safely and efficiently under resource, time and motion constraints. In this paper, we formalize this as the Scheduling and Motion Planning problem for multi-object navigation in shared workspaces. We propose a novel solution framework that interleaves off-the-shelf schedulers and motion planners in an incremental learning loop. The scheduler generates candidate plans, while the motion planner checks feasibility and returns symbolic feedback, i.e., spatial conflicts and timing adjustments, to guide the scheduler towards motion-feasible solutions. We validate our proposal on logistics and job-shop scheduling benchmarks augmented with motion tasks, using state-of-the-art schedulers and sampling-based motion planners. Our results show the effectiveness of our framework in generating valid plans under complex temporal and spatial constraints, where synchronized motion is critical.

ROMay 6, 2020
Robotic Arm Control and Task Training through Deep Reinforcement Learning

Andrea Franceschetti, Elisa Tosello, Nicola Castaman et al.

This paper proposes a detailed and extensive comparison of the Trust Region Policy Optimization and DeepQ-Network with Normalized Advantage Functions with respect to other state of the art algorithms, namely Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient and Vanilla Policy Gradient. Comparisons demonstrate that the former have better performances then the latter when asking robotic arms to accomplish manipulation tasks such as reaching a random target pose and pick &placing an object. Both simulated and real-world experiments are provided. Simulation lets us show the procedures that we adopted to precisely estimate the algorithms hyper-parameters and to correctly design good policies. Real-world experiments let show that our polices, if correctly trained on simulation, can be transferred and executed in a real environment with almost no changes.

RONov 23, 2017
RUR53: an Unmanned Ground Vehicle for Navigation, Recognition and Manipulation

Nicola Castaman, Elisa Tosello, Morris Antonello et al.

This paper proposes RUR53: an Unmanned Ground Vehicle able to autonomously navigate through, identify, and reach areas of interest; and there recognize, localize, and manipulate work tools to perform complex manipulation tasks. The proposed contribution includes a modular software architecture where each module solves specific sub-tasks and that can be easily enlarged to satisfy new requirements. Included indoor and outdoor tests demonstrate the capability of the proposed system to autonomously detect a target object (a panel) and precisely dock in front of it while avoiding obstacles. They show it can autonomously recognize and manipulate target work tools (i.e., wrenches and valve stems) to accomplish complex tasks (i.e., use a wrench to rotate a valve stem). A specific case study is described where the proposed modular architecture lets easy switch to a semi-teleoperated mode. The paper exhaustively describes description of both the hardware and software setup of RUR53, its performance when tests at the 2017 Mohamed Bin Zayed International Robotics Challenge, and the lessons we learned when participating at this competition, where we ranked third in the Gran Challenge in collaboration with the Czech Technical University in Prague, the University of Pennsylvania, and the University of Lincoln (UK).

RONov 4, 2017
Conditional Task and Motion Planning through an Effort-based Approach

Nicola Castaman, Elisa Tosello, Enrico Pagello

This paper proposes a preliminary work on a Conditional Task and Motion Planning algorithm able to find a plan that minimizes robot efforts while solving assigned tasks. Unlike most of the existing approaches that replan a path only when it becomes unfeasible (e.g., no collision-free paths exist), the proposed algorithm takes into consideration a replanning procedure whenever an effort-saving is possible. The effort is here considered as the execution time, but it is extensible to the robot energy consumption. The computed plan is both conditional and dynamically adaptable to the unexpected environmental changes. Based on the theoretical analysis of the algorithm, authors expect their proposal to be complete and scalable. In progress experiments aim to prove this investigation.