LGAug 11, 2024
Predicting Chaotic System Behavior using Machine Learning TechniquesHuaiyuan Rao, Yichen Zhao, Qiang Lai
Recently, machine learning techniques, particularly deep learning, have demonstrated superior performance over traditional time series forecasting methods across various applications, including both single-variable and multi-variable predictions. This study aims to investigate the capability of i) Next Generation Reservoir Computing (NG-RC) ii) Reservoir Computing (RC) iii) Long short-term Memory (LSTM) for predicting chaotic system behavior, and to compare their performance in terms of accuracy, efficiency, and robustness. These methods are applied to predict time series obtained from four representative chaotic systems including Lorenz, Rössler, Chen, Qi systems. In conclusion, we found that NG-RC is more computationally efficient and offers greater potential for predicting chaotic system behavior.
15.4CRMar 30
Differential Privacy for Symbolic Trajectories via the Permute-and-Flip MechanismAlexander Benvenuti, Huaiyuan Rao, Matthew Hale
Privacy techniques have been developed for data-driven systems, but systems with non-numeric data cannot use typical noise-adding techniques. Therefore, we develop a new mechanism for privatizing state trajectories of symbolic systems that may be represented as words over a finite alphabet. Such systems include Markov chains, Markov decision processes, and finite-state automata, and we protect their symbolic trajectories with differential privacy. The mechanism we develop randomly selects a private approximation to be released in place of the original sensitive word, with a bias towards low-error private words. This work is based on the permute-and-flip mechanism for differential privacy, which can be applied to non-numeric data. However, a na\"ıve implementation would have to enumerate an exponentially large list of words to generate a private word. As a result, we develop a new mechanism that generates private words without ever needing to enumerate such a list. We prove that the accuracy of our mechanism is never worse than the prior state of the art, and we empirically show on a real traffic dataset that it introduces up to $55\%$ less error than the prior state of the art under a conventional privacy implementation.