Zhanping Song

Shipeng Liu, Liang Zhao, Dengfeng Chen et al.

Quantifying and evaluating image complexity can be instrumental in enhancing the performance of various computer vision tasks. Supervised learning can effectively learn image complexity features from well-annotated datasets. However, creating such datasets requires expensive manual annotation costs. The models may learn human subjective biases from it. In this work, we introduce the MoCo v2 framework. We utilize contrastive learning to represent image complexity, named CLIC (Contrastive Learning for Image Complexity). We find that there are complexity differences between different local regions of an image, and propose Random Crop and Mix (RCM), which can produce positive samples consisting of multi-scale local crops. RCM can also expand the train set and increase data diversity without introducing additional data. We conduct extensive experiments with CLIC, comparing it with both unsupervised and supervised methods. The results demonstrate that the performance of CLIC is comparable to that of state-of-the-art supervised methods. In addition, we establish the pipelines that can apply CLIC to computer vision tasks to effectively improve their performance.

Shipeng Liu, Liang Zhao, Dengfeng Chen et al.

Tunnel inspection requires outputs that can support defect localization, measurement, severity grading, and engineering documentation. Existing training-free foundation-model pipelines usually stop at coarse open-vocabulary proposals, which are difficult to use directly in interference-heavy tunnel scenes. We propose a training-free framework TunnelMIND. Specifically, language-guided defect proposals are not treated as final outputs; instead, their spatial support is recalibrated at inference time through dense visual consistency, so that coarse semantic anchors can be transformed into more reliable prompts under tunnel-specific hard negatives. The resulting masks are further reconstructed into structured defect entities with category, location, geometry, severity, and context attributes, which are then mapped to retrieval-grounded explanation and engineering-readable report generation under expert knowledge constraints. On visible, GPR, and road defect tasks, TunnelMIND achieves F1 scores of 0.68, 0.78, and 0.72, respectively. Overall, TunnelMIND shows that training-free tunnel inspection can move beyond coarse localization toward structured defect evidence for engineering assessment.