Carlos Ansótegui

Carlos Ansotegui, Eduard Torres

Combinatorial Testing (CT) tools are essential to test properly a wide range of systems (train systems, Graphical User Interfaces (GUIs), autonomous driving systems, etc). While there is an active research community working on developing CT tools, paradoxically little attention has been paid to making available enough resources to test the CT tools themselves. In particular, the set of available benchmarks to asses their correctness, effectiveness and efficiency is rather limited. In this paper, we introduce a new generator of CT benchmarks that essentially borrows the structure contained in the plethora of available Combinatorial Problems from other research communities in order to create meaningful benchmarks. We additionally perform an extensive evaluation of CT tools with these new benchmarks. Thanks to this study we provide some insights on under which circumstances a particular CT tool should be used.

Carlos Ansótegui, Jordi Levy

Representing some problems with XOR clauses (parity constraints) can allow to apply more efficient reasoning techniques. In this paper, we present a gadget for translating SAT clauses into Max2XOR constraints, i.e., XOR clauses of at most 2 variables equal to zero or to one. Additionally, we present new resolution rules for the Max2XOR problem which asks for which is the maximum number of constraints that can be satisfied from a set of 2XOR equations.

Josep Alòs, Carlos Ansótegui, Josep M. Salvia et al.

In this paper, we describe how we can effectively exploit alternative parameter configurations to a MaxSAT solver. We describe how these configurations can be computed in the context of MaxSAT. In particular, we experimentally show how to easily combine configurations of a non-competitive solver to obtain a better solving approach.

Josep Alos, Carlos Ansotegui, Eduard Torres

We present an approach to improve the accuracy-interpretability trade-off of Machine Learning (ML) Decision Trees (DTs). In particular, we apply Maximum Satisfiability technology to compute Minimum Pure DTs (MPDTs). We improve the runtime of previous approaches and, show that these MPDTs can outperform the accuracy of DTs generated with the ML framework sklearn.

Carlos Ansótegui, Felip Manyà, Jesus Ojeda et al.

We present a Satisfiability (SAT)-based approach for building Mixed Covering Arrays with Constraints of minimum length, referred to as the Covering Array Number problem. This problem is central in Combinatorial Testing for the detection of system failures. In particular, we show how to apply Maximum Satisfiability (MaxSAT) technology by describing efficient encodings for different classes of complete and incomplete MaxSAT solvers to compute optimal and suboptimal solutions, respectively. Similarly, we show how to solve through MaxSAT technology a closely related problem, the Tuple Number problem, which we extend to incorporate constraints. For this problem, we additionally provide a new MaxSAT-based incomplete algorithm. The extensive experimental evaluation we carry out on the available Mixed Covering Arrays with Constraints benchmarks and the comparison with state-of-the-art tools confirm the good performance of our approaches.

Carlos Ansotegui, Meinolf Sellmann, Tapan Shah et al.

We consider black-box optimization in which only an extremely limited number of function evaluations, on the order of around 100, are affordable and the function evaluations must be performed in even fewer batches of a limited number of parallel trials. This is a typical scenario when optimizing variable settings that are very costly to evaluate, for example in the context of simulation-based optimization or machine learning hyperparameterization. We propose an original method that uses established approaches to propose a set of points for each batch and then down-selects from these candidate points to the number of trials that can be run in parallel. The key novelty of our approach lies in the introduction of a hyperparameterized method for down-selecting the number of candidates to the allowed batch-size, which is optimized offline using automated algorithm configuration. We tune this method for black box optimization and then evaluate on classical black box optimization benchmarks. Our results show that it is possible to learn how to combine evaluation points suggested by highly diverse black box optimization methods conditioned on the progress of the optimization. Compared with the state of the art in black box minimization and various other methods specifically geared towards few-shot minimization, we achieve an average reduction of 50\% of normalized cost, which is a highly significant improvement in performance.