Matthias Blohm

Sebastian Brändle, Marc Hanussek, Matthias Blohm et al.

Automated Machine Learning (AutoML) has gained increasing success on tabular data in recent years. However, processing unstructured data like text is a challenge and not widely supported by open-source AutoML tools. This work compares three manually created text representations and text embeddings automatically created by AutoML tools. Our benchmark includes four popular open-source AutoML tools and eight datasets for text classification purposes. The results show that straightforward text representations perform better than AutoML tools with automatically created text embeddings.

Matthias Blohm, Marc Hanussek, Maximilien Kintz

Recently, Automated Machine Learning (AutoML) has registered increasing success with respect to tabular data. However, the question arises whether AutoML can also be applied effectively to text classification tasks. This work compares four AutoML tools on 13 different popular datasets, including Kaggle competitions, and opposes human performance. The results show that the AutoML tools perform better than the machine learning community in 4 out of 13 tasks and that two stand out.

Marc Hanussek, Matthias Blohm, Maximilien Kintz

In the last few years, Automated Machine Learning (AutoML) has gained much attention. With that said, the question arises whether AutoML can outperform results achieved by human data scientists. This paper compares four AutoML frameworks on 12 different popular datasets from OpenML; six of them supervised classification tasks and the other six supervised regression ones. Additionally, we consider a real-life dataset from one of our recent projects. The results show that the automated frameworks perform better or equal than the machine learning community in 7 out of 12 OpenML tasks.

Matthias Blohm, Glorianna Jagfeld, Ekta Sood et al.

We propose a machine reading comprehension model based on the compare-aggregate framework with two-staged attention that achieves state-of-the-art results on the MovieQA question answering dataset. To investigate the limitations of our model as well as the behavioral difference between convolutional and recurrent neural networks, we generate adversarial examples to confuse the model and compare to human performance. Furthermore, we assess the generalizability of our model by analyzing its differences to human inference,