Rishabh Agrawal

Rishabh Agrawal

Few-shot learning (FSL) enables machine learning models to generalize effectively with minimal labeled data, making it crucial for data-scarce domains such as healthcare, robotics, and natural language processing. Despite its potential, FSL faces challenges including sensitivity to initialization, difficulty in adapting to diverse domains, and vulnerability to noisy datasets. To address these issues, this paper introduces Adaptive Few-Shot Learning (AFSL), a framework that integrates advancements in meta-learning, domain alignment, noise resilience, and multi-modal integration. AFSL consists of four key modules: a Dynamic Stability Module for performance consistency, a Contextual Domain Alignment Module for domain adaptation, a Noise-Adaptive Resilience Module for handling noisy data, and a Multi-Modal Fusion Module for integrating diverse modalities. This work also explores strategies such as task-aware data augmentation, semi-supervised learning, and explainable AI techniques to enhance the applicability and robustness of FSL. AFSL provides scalable, reliable, and impactful solutions for real-world, high-stakes domains.

Huy Tu, Rishabh Agrawal, Tim Menzies

How should software engineering be adapted for Computational Science (CS)? If we understood that, then we could better support software sustainability, verifiability, reproducibility, comprehension, and usability for CS community. For example, improving the maintainability of the CS code could lead to: (a) faster adaptation of scientific project simulations to new and efficient hardware (multi-core and heterogeneous systems); (b) better support for larger teams to co-ordinate (through integration with interdisciplinary teams); and (c) an extended capability to model complex phenomena. In order to better understand computational science, this paper uses quantitative evidence (from 59 CS projects in Github) to check 13 published beliefs about CS. These beliefs reflect on (a) the nature of scientific challenges; (b) the implications of limitations of computer hardware; and (c) the cultural environment of scientific software development. What we found was, using this new data from Github, only a minority of those older beliefs can be endorsed. More than half of the pre-existing beliefs are dubious, which leads us to conclude that the nature of CS software development is changing. Further, going forward, this has implications for (1) what kinds of tools we would propose to better support computational science and (2) research directions for both communities.

Amritanshu Agrawal, Xueqi Yang, Rishabh Agrawal et al.

How can we make software analytics simpler and faster? One method is to match the complexity of analysis to the intrinsic complexity of the data being explored. For example, hyperparameter optimizers find the control settings for data miners that improve the predictions generated via software analytics. Sometimes, very fast hyperparameter optimization can be achieved by "DODGE-ing"; i.e. simply steering way from settings that lead to similar conclusions. But when is it wise to use that simple approach and when must we use more complex (and much slower) optimizers?} To answer this, we applied hyperparameter optimization to 120 SE data sets that explored bad smell detection, predicting Github issue close time, bug report analysis, defect prediction, and dozens of other non-SE problems. We find that the simple DODGE works best for data sets with low "intrinsic dimensionality" (u ~ 3) and very poorly for higher-dimensional data (u > 8). Nearly all the SE data seen here was intrinsically low-dimensional, indicating that DODGE is applicable for many SE analytics tasks.