Konstantin Fackeldey

AI
h-index14
3papers
4citations
Novelty27%
AI Score30

3 Papers

8.2HCMar 18
FACET: Multi-Agent AI Supporting Teachers in Scaling Differentiated Learning for Diverse Students

Jana Gonnermann-Müller, Jennifer Haase, Nicolas Leins et al.

Classrooms are becoming increasingly heterogeneous, comprising learners with diverse performance and motivation levels, language proficiencies, and learning differences such as dyslexia and ADHD. While teachers recognize the need for differentiated instruction, growing workloads create substantial barriers, making differentiated instruction an ideal that is often unrealized in practice. Current AI educational tools, which promise differentiated materials, are predominantly student-facing and performance-centric, ignoring other aspects that shape learning outcomes. We introduce FACET, a teacher-facing multi-agent framework designed to address these gaps by supporting differentiation that accounts for motivation, performance, and learning differences. Developed with educational stakeholders from the outset, the framework coordinates four specialized agents, including learner simulation, diagnostic assessment, material generation, and evaluation within a teacher-in-the-loop design. School principals (N = 30) shaped system requirements through participatory workshops, while in-service K-12 teachers (N = 70) evaluated material quality. Mixed-methods evaluation demonstrates strong perceived value for inclusive differentiation. Practitioners emphasized both the urgent need arising from classroom heterogeneity and the importance of maintaining pedagogical autonomy as a prerequisite for adoption. We discuss implications for future school deployment and outline partnerships for longitudinal classroom implementation.

4.5AIJan 14, 2022
The Mathematics of Comparing Objects

Marcus Weber, Konstantin Fackeldey

"After reading two different crime stories, an artificial intelligence concludes that in both stories the police has found the murderer just by random." -- To what extend and under which assumptions this is a description of a realistic scenario?

0.3CLDec 11, 2020
The Complexity of Comparative Text Analysis -- "The Gardener is always the Murderer" says the Fourth Machine

Marcus Weber, Konstantin Fackeldey

There is a heated debate about how far computers can map the complexity of text analysis compared to the abilities of the whole team of human researchers. A "deep" analysis of a given text is still beyond the possibilities of modern computers. In the heart of the existing computational text analysis algorithms there are operations with real numbers, such as additions and multiplications according to the rules of algebraic fields. However, the process of "comparing" has a very precise mathematical structure, which is different from the structure of an algebraic field. The mathematical structure of "comparing" can be expressed by using Boolean rings. We build on this structure and define the corresponding algebraic equations lifting algorithms of comparative text analysis onto the "correct" algebraic basis. From this point of view, we can investigate the question of {\em computational} complexity of comparative text analysis.