Kangqi Li

Jingwen Tong, Fang Liu, Linkai Xv et al.

LLM agents are emerging as a key enabler for autonomous wireless network management. Reliably deploying them, however, demands benchmarks that reflect real engineering risk. Existing wireless benchmarks evaluate single isolated capabilities and treat all errors uniformly, missing both cascaded-chain failures and catastrophic unit confusions (\textit{e.g.}, dB vs.\ dBm). We present \wb{}, the first tolerance-aware, tool-integrated benchmark for LLM-based wireless agents. \wb{} is organized as a three-tier cognitive hierarchy: domain knowledge reasoning (WCHW, 1{,}392 items), intent-driven resource allocation (WCNS, 1{,}000 items), and proactive multi-step decisions under mobility (WCMSA, 1{,}000 items). Moreover, \wb{} is established on three design principles: \emph{(i)}~tolerance-aware scoring with catastrophic-error detection; \emph{(ii)}~tool-necessary tasks requiring a 3GPP-compliant ray-tracing query for channel quality; and \emph{(iii)}~Chain-of-Thought (CoT)-traceable items, where every benchmark item ships with a complete CoT trajectory enabling fine-grained diagnosis of where in the reasoning chain an agent fails. Our numerical results show that the direct-prompting model (GPT-4o) scores $68\%$, trailing a tool-integrated agent ($84.64\%$) by $16.64$\,pp; $23\%$ of errors are catastrophic failures invisible to exact-match metrics. More importantly, the hierarchy decomposes errors into four actionable diagnostic categories that flat evaluation cannot reveal. Code and data: https://wirelessbench.github.io/.

Yiyang Zhou, Linjie Li, Shi Qiu et al. · microsoft-research

Existing video benchmarks often resemble image-based benchmarks, with question types like "What actions does the person perform throughout the video?" or "What color is the woman's dress in the video?" For these, models can often answer by scanning just a few key frames, without deep temporal reasoning. This limits our ability to assess whether large vision-language models (LVLMs) can truly think with videos rather than perform superficial frame-level analysis. To address this, we introduce GLIMPSE, a benchmark specifically designed to evaluate whether LVLMs can genuinely think with videos. Unlike prior benchmarks, GLIMPSE emphasizes comprehensive video understanding beyond static image cues. It consists of 3,269 videos and over 4,342 highly visual-centric questions across 11 categories, including Trajectory Analysis, Temporal Reasoning, and Forensics Detection. All questions are carefully crafted by human annotators and require watching the entire video and reasoning over full video context-this is what we mean by thinking with video. These questions cannot be answered by scanning selected frames or relying on text alone. In human evaluations, GLIMPSE achieves 94.82% accuracy, but current LVLMs face significant challenges. Even the best-performing model, GPT-o3, reaches only 66.43%, highlighting that LVLMs still struggle to move beyond surface-level reasoning to truly think with videos.