Christoph G. Schuetz

Sebastian Gruber, Tobias Harzfeld, Christoph G. Schuetz et al.

In distributed optimization, multiple parties collaborate to find an optimal solution to a problem. Privacy-preserving distributed optimization uses techniques, such as secure multi-party computation (MPC), to protect the private inputs of each party. In time-critical settings, the runtime overhead introduced by privacy-preserving computations may prevent the optimization from finishing within the deadline. This paper presents an approach for privacy-preserving distributed optimization in time-critical settings that combines evolutionary algorithms for solution search and MPC for the evaluation of solutions. The approach reduces the impact of privacy-preserving computations on runtime and allows to return solution within the deadline. Obfuscation of evaluation results provides additional protection for private inputs from an honest-but-curious platform provider, but introduces a potential trade-off between protection and solution quality. This trade-off is investigated in experiments using a genetic algorithm for both the single-objective assignment problem and the traveling salesperson problem, as well as NSGA-II for the multi-objective assignment problem.

Marina Luketina, Andrea Benkel, Christoph G. Schuetz

This paper provides an experimental evaluation of the capability of large language models (LLMs) to assist in legal decision-making within the framework of Austrian and European Union value-added tax (VAT) law. In tax consulting practice, clients often describe cases in natural language, making LLMs a prime candidate for supporting automated decision-making and reducing the workload of tax professionals. Given the requirement for legally grounded and well-justified analyses, the propensity of LLMs to hallucinate presents a considerable challenge. The experiments focus on two common methods for enhancing LLM performance: fine-tuning and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). In this study, these methods are applied on both textbook cases and real-world cases from a tax consulting firm to systematically determine the best configurations of LLM-based systems and assess the legal-reasoning capabilities of LLMs. The findings highlight the potential of using LLMs to support tax consultants by automating routine tasks and providing initial analyses, although current prototypes are not ready for full automation due to the sensitivity of the legal domain. The findings indicate that LLMs, when properly configured, can effectively support tax professionals in VAT tasks and provide legally grounded justifications for decisions. However, limitations remain regarding the handling of implicit client knowledge and context-specific documentation, underscoring the need for future integration of structured background information.