Daniel M. Low

Satvik Dixit, Daniel M. Low, Gasser Elbanna et al. · cmu

Pre-trained deep learning embeddings have consistently shown superior performance over handcrafted acoustic features in speech emotion recognition (SER). However, unlike acoustic features with clear physical meaning, these embeddings lack clear interpretability. Explaining these embeddings is crucial for building trust in healthcare and security applications and advancing the scientific understanding of the acoustic information that is encoded in them. This paper proposes a modified probing approach to explain deep learning embeddings in the SER space. We predict interpretable acoustic features (e.g., f0, loudness) from (i) the complete set of embeddings and (ii) a subset of the embedding dimensions identified as most important for predicting each emotion. If the subset of the most important dimensions better predicts a given emotion than all dimensions and also predicts specific acoustic features more accurately, we infer those acoustic features are important for the embedding model for the given task. We conducted experiments using the WavLM embeddings and eGeMAPS acoustic features as audio representations, applying our method to the RAVDESS and SAVEE emotional speech datasets. Based on this evaluation, we demonstrate that Energy, Frequency, Spectral, and Temporal categories of acoustic features provide diminishing information to SER in that order, demonstrating the utility of the probing classifier method to relate embeddings to interpretable acoustic features.

Minsol Michelle Kim, Daniel M. Low, David Lafond et al.

Breaking negative mental health cycles, including rumination and recurring regrets, requires reflection that translates awareness into behavioral change. Grounded in the Transtheoretical Model (TTM) and Gross's Emotion Regulation (ER) Process Model, we examine how Technologies Supporting Self-Reflection (TSR) bridge reflection and action. In a 15-day in-the-wild study (N = 20), participants used a voice-based journaling system to capture regrets and wishes and engaged in WhatIf-Planning, a novel structured reflection module integrating counterfactual thinking with if-then planning. Participants were randomized to either a free-form condition or a Gross-guided condition, which maps the five processes of Gross's ER model into explicit journaling prompts. We contribute: (1) a unified reflection-to-action TSR system that operationalizes the Preparation stage of TTM to bridge Contemplation and Action, and (2) triangulated empirical evidence from an in-the-wild journaling study that first operationalizes Gross's Process Model, revealing effects on coping flexibility and emotion regulation in daily life. Results show significant pre-post improvements in coping flexibility, indicating adaptive self-regulation across conditions, with the Gross-guided group generating more counterfactual alternatives, articulating concrete if-then action plans, and implementing more plans for self-driven change.

Mostafa Abdou, Artur Kulmizev, Felix Hill et al.

Representational Similarity Analysis (RSA) is a technique developed by neuroscientists for comparing activity patterns of different measurement modalities (e.g., fMRI, electrophysiology, behavior). As a framework, RSA has several advantages over existing approaches to interpretation of language encoders based on probing or diagnostic classification: namely, it does not require large training samples, is not prone to overfitting, and it enables a more transparent comparison between the representational geometries of different models and modalities. We demonstrate the utility of RSA by establishing a previously unknown correspondence between widely-employed pretrained language encoders and human processing difficulty via eye-tracking data, showcasing its potential in the interpretability toolbox for neural models