Eero Lehtonen

Eero Lehtonen, Tuomo Komulainen, Ari Paasio et al.

The current event cameras are bio-inspired sensors that respond to brightness changes in the scene asynchronously and independently for every pixel, and transmit these changes as ternary event streams. Event cameras have several benefits over conventional digital cameras, such as significantly higher temporal resolution and pixel bandwidth resulting in reduced motion blur, and very high dynamic range. However, they also introduce challenges such as the difficulty of applying existing computer vision algorithms to the output event streams, and the flood of uninformative events in the presence of oscillating light sources. Here we propose a new type of event, the gradient event, which benefits from the same properties as a conventional brightness event, but which is by design much less sensitive to oscillating light sources, and which enables considerably better grayscale frame reconstruction. We show that the gradient event -based video reconstruction outperforms existing state-of-the-art brightness event -based methods by a significant margin, when evaluated on publicly available event-to-video datasets. Our results show how gradient information can be used to significantly improve the acquisition of visual information by an event camera.

Jan-Niklas Voigt-Antons, Eero Lehtonen, Andres Pinilla Palacios et al.

In recent years 360$^{\circ}$ videos have been becoming more popular. For traditional media presentations, e.g., on a computer screen, a wide range of assessment methods are available. Different constructs, such as perceived quality or the induced emotional state of viewers, can be reliably assessed by subjective scales. Many of the subjective methods have only been validated using stimuli presented on a computer screen. This paper is using 360$^{\circ}$ videos to induce varying emotional states. Videos were presented 1) via a head-mounted display (HMD) and 2) via a traditional computer screen. Furthermore, participants were asked to rate their emotional state 1) in retrospect on the self-assessment manikin scale and 2) continuously on a 2-dimensional arousal-valence plane. In a repeated measures design, all participants (N = 18) used both presentation systems and both rating systems. Results indicate that there is a statistically significant difference in induced presence due to the presentation system. Furthermore, there was no statistically significant difference in ratings gathered with the two presentation systems. Finally, it was found that for arousal measures, a statistically significant difference could be found for the different rating methods, potentially indicating an underestimation of arousal ratings gathered in retrospect for screen presentation. In the future, rating methods such as a 2-dimensional arousal-valence plane could offer the advantage of enabling a reliable measurement of emotional states while being more embedded in the experience itself, enabling a more precise capturing of the emotional states.