Nick Fischer

Karl Bringmann, Nick Fischer, Yanheng Wang

The subgraph isomorphism problem and its generalizations such as conjunctive queries, where some nodes are projected, are among the most fundamental problems in graph algorithms and database theory. In this paper, we study the listing and enumeration variants of these problems and present two main results. (1) We present the first algorithms for enumerating projected trees with polynomial preprocessing time ($\widetilde{O}(n^{17.42})$) and polylogarithmic delay ($\mathrm{polylog}(n)$). Prior to this work, all algorithms in the literature required time $Ω(n^{Ω(k)} + t)$ or $t \cdot n^{Ω(1)}$ to list all copies of a $k$-node tree with projections, where $t$ is the number of solutions. Our result generalizes to arbitrary projected hypergraphs, achieving enumeration in preprocessing time $\widetilde{O}(m^{17.42 \cdot \mathrm{subw}(H)})$ and polylogarithmic delay, where $\mathrm{subw}(H)$ is the submodular width of the pattern hypergraph $H$. We heavily rely on fast (rectangular and output-sensitive) matrix multiplication, which we complement by fine-grained lower bounds indicating that any algorithm beating time $Ω(n^{Ω(k)} + t)$ must rely on fast matrix multiplication. (2) As our second main result, we present a generic enumeration-to-listing reduction, establishing that listing and enumeration are equivalent under natural assumptions. For (colored) subgraph isomorphism, our reduction transforms any listing algorithm running in time $O(f(n,m) + t \cdot g(n,m))$ into an enumeration algorithm with preprocessing time $O((f(n,m)+g(n,m)+m) \log^2 n)$ and delay $O(g(n,m))$. We utilize this equivalence as a tool for proving our first main result, and we expect that our generic reduction will find many future applications.

Nick Fischer, Mursalin Habib

We revisit the Binary Closest String problem, which asks, given a set of binary strings $X \subseteq \{0, 1\}^n$, to compute a string minimizing the maximum Hamming distance to $X$. A long line of work has focused on parameterized algorithms with respect to the optimal distance $d$, yielding a sequence of improvements from $O^*(d^d)$ through $O^*(16^d)$, $O^*(9.513^d)$, $O^*(8^d)$, $O^*(6.731^d)$ to the current best-known running time of $O^*(5^d)$ [Chen, Ma, Wang; Algorithmica '16]. We present a faster randomized algorithm running in time $O^*(4^d)$. Our result matches a recent fine-grained lower bound [Abboud, Fischer, Goldenberg, Karthik C.S., Safier; ESA '23], and is therefore conditionally optimal. As an extra benefit, our algorithm is remarkably simple.

Bartłomiej Dudek, Nick Fischer, Geri Gokaj et al.

We revisit the complexity of verifying basic identities, such as associativity and distributivity, on a given finite algebraic structure. In particular, while Rajagopalan and Schulman (FOCS'96, SICOMP'00) gave a surprising randomized algorithm to verify associativity of an operation $\odot: S\times S\to S$ in optimal time $O(|S|^2)$, they left the open problem of finding any subcubic algorithm for verifying distributivity of given operations $\odot,\oplus: S\times S\to S$. Our results are as follows: * We resolve the open problem by Rajagopalan and Schulman by devising an algorithm verifying distributivity in strongly subcubic time $O(|S|^ω)$, together with a matching conditional lower bound based on the Triangle Detection Hypothesis. * We propose arithmetic progression detection in small universes as a consequential algorithmic challenge: We show that unless we can detect $4$-term arithmetic progressions in a set $X\subseteq\{1,\dots, N\}$ in time $O(N^{2-ε})$, then (a) the 3-uniform 4-hyperclique hypothesis is true, and (b) verifying certain identities requires running time~$|S|^{3-o(1)}$. * A careful combination of our algorithmic and hardness ideas allows us to \emph{fully classify} a natural subclass of identities: Specifically, any 3-variable identity over binary operations in which no side is a subexpression of the other is either: (1) verifiable in randomized time $O(|S|^2)$, (2) verifiable in randomized time $O(|S|^ω)$ with a matching lower bound from triangle detection, or (3) trivially verifiable in time $O(|S|^3)$ with a matching lower bound from hardness of 4-term arithmetic progression detection. * We obtain near-optimal algorithms for verifying whether a given algebraic structure forms a field or ring, and show that \emph{counting} the number of distributive triples is conditionally harder than verifying distributivity.

Nick Fischer

The APSP Hypothesis states that the All-Pairs Shortest Paths (APSP) problem requires time $n^{3-o(1)}$ on graphs with polynomially bounded integer edge weights. Two increasingly stronger assumptions are the Strong APSP Hypothesis and the Directed Unweighted APSP Hypothesis, which state that the fastest-known APSP algorithms on graphs with small weights and unweighted graphs, respectively, are best-possible. In this paper, we design an efficient universe reduction for APSP, which proves that these three hypotheses are, in fact, equivalent, conditioned on $ω= 2$ and a plausible additive combinatorics assumption. Along the way, we resolve the fine-grained complexity of many long-standing graph and matrix problems with "intermediate" complexity such as Node-Weighted APSP, All-Pairs Bottleneck Paths, Monotone Min-Plus Product in certain settings, and many others, by designing matching APSP-based lower bounds.

Shyan Akmal, Nick Fischer

Weighted variants of triangle detection are an important object of study because of their prominence in fine-grained complexity. We revisit the Node-Weighted Triangle problem, where the goal is to decide if a vertex-weighted graph contains a triangle whose node weights sum to zero. This problem has been the focus of a celebrated line of work, beginning with a subcubic-time algorithm [Vassilevska, Williams; STOC '06], and culminating in algorithms running almost in matrix multiplication time, $O(\textsf{MM}(n) + n^2\cdot 2^{O(\sqrt{\log n})})$ [Czumaj, Lingas; SODA '07], [Vassilevska W., Williams; STOC '09]. This runtime is almost-optimal, since even detecting an unweighted triangle is conjectured to require matrix multiplication time $\textsf{MM}(n)$. However, the superpolylogarithmic $2^{Ω(\sqrt{\log n})}$ overhead persists in a world where near-optimal matrix multiplication is possible (i.e., $\textsf{MM}(n) \leq n^2\text{poly}(\log n)$). In this paper, we present a new algorithm solving Node-Weighted Triangle in $O(\textsf{MM}(n))$ time, closing the gap to unweighted triangle detection completely. Remarkably, our algorithm is much simpler than previous approaches, which use involved recursion schemes and communication protocols.

Nick Fischer, Marvin Künnemann, Mirza Redžić et al.

Is detecting a $k$-clique in $k$-partite regular (hyper-)graphs as hard as in the general case? Intuition suggests yes, but proving this -- especially for hypergraphs -- poses notable challenges. Concretely, we consider a strong notion of regularity in $h$-uniform hypergraphs, where we essentially require that any subset of at most $h-1$ is incident to a uniform number of hyperedges. Such notions are studied intensively in the combinatorial block design literature. We show that any $f(k)n^{g(k)}$-time algorithm for detecting $k$-cliques in such graphs transfers to an $f'(k)n^{g(k)}$-time algorithm for the general case, establishing a fine-grained equivalence between the $h$-uniform hyperclique hypothesis and its natural regular analogue. Equipped with this regularization result, we then fully resolve the fine-grained complexity of optimizing Boolean constraint satisfaction problems over assignments with $k$ non-zeros. Our characterization depends on the maximum degree $d$ of a constraint function. Specifically, if $d\le 1$, we obtain a linear-time solvable problem, if $d=2$, the time complexity is essentially equivalent to $k$-clique detection, and if $d\ge 3$ the problem requires exhaustive-search time under the 3-uniform hyperclique hypothesis. To obtain our hardness results, the regularization result plays a crucial role, enabling a very convenient approach when applied carefully. We believe that our regularization result will find further applications in the future.

Amir Abboud, Nick Fischer, Elazar Goldenberg et al.

We study the fundamental problem of finding the best string to represent a given set, in the form of the Closest String problem: Given a set $X \subseteq Σ^d$ of $n$ strings, find the string $x^*$ minimizing the radius of the smallest Hamming ball around $x^*$ that encloses all the strings in $X$. In this paper, we investigate whether the Closest String problem admits algorithms that are faster than the trivial exhaustive search algorithm. We obtain the following results for the two natural versions of the problem: $\bullet$ In the continuous Closest String problem, the goal is to find the solution string $x^*$ anywhere in $Σ^d$. For binary strings, the exhaustive search algorithm runs in time $O(2^d poly(nd))$ and we prove that it cannot be improved to time $O(2^{(1-ε) d} poly(nd))$, for any $ε> 0$, unless the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis fails. $\bullet$ In the discrete Closest String problem, $x^*$ is required to be in the input set $X$. While this problem is clearly in polynomial time, its fine-grained complexity has been pinpointed to be quadratic time $n^{2 \pm o(1)}$ whenever the dimension is $ω(\log n) < d < n^{o(1)}$. We complement this known hardness result with new algorithms, proving essentially that whenever $d$ falls out of this hard range, the discrete Closest String problem can be solved faster than exhaustive search. In the small-$d$ regime, our algorithm is based on a novel application of the inclusion-exclusion principle. Interestingly, all of our results apply (and some are even stronger) to the natural dual of the Closest String problem, called the Remotest String problem, where the task is to find a string maximizing the Hamming distance to all the strings in $X$.