Shahpour Alirezaee

Rajmeet Singh, Manveen Kaur, Shahpour Alirezaee et al.

In greenhouse tomato production, automated harvesting requires accurate detection of ripe tomatoes, ripeness classification, and precise picking-point localization for robotic end-effectors. This paper proposes YOLO26-RipeLoc Lite, a lightweight deep learning architecture based on YOLO26 for simultaneous detection, ripeness classification, and center-point localization of greenhouse tomatoes. The model introduces three modifications: (1) a Lightweight Feature Pyramid Network (LFPN) with depthwise separable convolutions for efficient multi-scale fusion, (2) a Ripeness-Aware Attention Module (RAAM) with dual pooling and a learnable ripeness bias vector for enhanced color-texture discrimination, and (3) a Compact Detection Head (CDH) with shared convolutions and an integrated center-point regression branch for direct grasp planning. The model is evaluated on a custom dataset of 1,500 images with 6,227 instances (3,566 ripe, 2,661 unripe) from the SILAL greenhouse, Abu Dhabi, UAE. YOLO26-RipeLoc Lite achieves mAP@0.5 of 92.9% (95.2% ripe, 90.6% unripe) with the highest precision (95.2%) among all evaluated architectures using only 2.38M parameters. Post-training BatchNorm pruning at 30% reduces parameters to ~1.8M with negligible accuracy loss. Ablation studies confirm that greenhouse-aware HSV augmentation provides the largest improvement (+2.02 pp mAP@50), backbone freezing achieves peak precision (93.8%), and 3-phase progressive unfreezing yields the best localization quality (mAP@50:95 of 64.6%). Comparisons with YOLOv8n/s, YOLO11n/s, YOLO12n/s, and YOLO26s confirm superior accuracy-efficiency: 2.9 pp higher precision than YOLO12n with 7.0% fewer parameters and integrated center-point localization for robotic end-effector guidance.

Armin Nejadhossein Qasemabadi, Saeed Mozaffari, Mahdi Rezaei et al.

Accurate lane change prediction can reduce potential accidents and contribute to higher road safety. Adaptive cruise control (ACC), lane departure avoidance (LDA), and lane keeping assistance (LKA) are some conventional modules in advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS). Thanks to vehicle-to-vehicle communication (V2V), vehicles can share traffic information with surrounding vehicles, enabling cooperative adaptive cruise control (CACC). While ACC relies on the vehicle's sensors to obtain the position and velocity of the leading vehicle, CACC also has access to the acceleration of multiple vehicles through V2V communication. This paper compares the type of information (position, velocity, acceleration) and the number of surrounding vehicles for driver lane change prediction. We trained an LSTM (Long Short-Term Memory) on the HighD dataset to predict lane change intention. Results indicate a significant improvement in accuracy with an increase in the number of surrounding vehicles and the information received from them. Specifically, the proposed model can predict the ego vehicle lane change with 59.15% and 92.43% accuracy in ACC and CACC scenarios, respectively.

Rajmeet Singh, Saeed Mozaffari, Mahdi Rezaei et al.

The development of Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) systems aims to enhance the safety and comfort of vehicles by automatically regulating the speed of the vehicle to ensure a safe gap from the preceding vehicle. However, conventional ACC systems are unable to adapt themselves to changing driving conditions and drivers' behavior. To address this limitation, we propose a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) based ACC system that can learn from past driving experiences and adapt and predict new situations in real time. The model is constructed based on the real-world highD dataset, acquired from German highways with the assistance of camera-equipped drones. We evaluated the ACC system under aggressive lane changes when the side lane preceding vehicle cut off, forcing the targeted driver to reduce speed. To this end, the proposed system was assessed on a simulated driving environment and compared with a feedforward Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model and Model Predictive Control (MPC) model. The results show that the LSTM-based system is 19.25% more accurate than the ANN model and 5.9% more accurate than the MPC model in terms of predicting future values of subject vehicle acceleration. The simulation is done in Matlab/Simulink environment.