Garth A. Gibson

LG
h-index67
5papers
356citations
Novelty53%
AI Score28

5 Papers

19.8DCMay 10, 2019Code
Priority-based Parameter Propagation for Distributed DNN Training

Anand Jayarajan, Jinliang Wei, Garth Gibson et al.

Data parallel training is widely used for scaling distributed deep neural network (DNN) training. However, the performance benefits are often limited by the communication-heavy parameter synchronization step. In this paper, we take advantage of the domain specific knowledge of DNN training and overlap parameter synchronization with computation in order to improve the training performance. We make two key observations: (1) the optimal data representation granularity for the communication may differ from that used by the underlying DNN model implementation and (2) different parameters can afford different synchronization delays. Based on these observations, we propose a new synchronization mechanism called Priority-based Parameter Propagation (P3). P3 synchronizes parameters at a finer granularity and schedules data transmission in such a way that the training process incurs minimal communication delay. We show that P3 can improve the training throughput of ResNet-50, Sockeye and VGG-19 by as much as 25%, 38% and 66% respectively on clusters with realistic network bandwidth

12.8LGMar 29, 2019
MLSys: The New Frontier of Machine Learning Systems

Alexander Ratner, Dan Alistarh, Gustavo Alonso et al.

Machine learning (ML) techniques are enjoying rapidly increasing adoption. However, designing and implementing the systems that support ML models in real-world deployments remains a significant obstacle, in large part due to the radically different development and deployment profile of modern ML methods, and the range of practical concerns that come with broader adoption. We propose to foster a new systems machine learning research community at the intersection of the traditional systems and ML communities, focused on topics such as hardware systems for ML, software systems for ML, and ML optimized for metrics beyond predictive accuracy. To do this, we describe a new conference, MLSys, that explicitly targets research at the intersection of systems and machine learning with a program committee split evenly between experts in systems and ML, and an explicit focus on topics at the intersection of the two.

15.9LGOct 29, 2014
High-Performance Distributed ML at Scale through Parameter Server Consistency Models

Wei Dai, Abhimanu Kumar, Jinliang Wei et al.

As Machine Learning (ML) applications increase in data size and model complexity, practitioners turn to distributed clusters to satisfy the increased computational and memory demands. Unfortunately, effective use of clusters for ML requires considerable expertise in writing distributed code, while highly-abstracted frameworks like Hadoop have not, in practice, approached the performance seen in specialized ML implementations. The recent Parameter Server (PS) paradigm is a middle ground between these extremes, allowing easy conversion of single-machine parallel ML applications into distributed ones, while maintaining high throughput through relaxed "consistency models" that allow inconsistent parameter reads. However, due to insufficient theoretical study, it is not clear which of these consistency models can really ensure correct ML algorithm output; at the same time, there remain many theoretically-motivated but undiscovered opportunities to maximize computational throughput. Motivated by this challenge, we study both the theoretical guarantees and empirical behavior of iterative-convergent ML algorithms in existing PS consistency models. We then use the gleaned insights to improve a consistency model using an "eager" PS communication mechanism, and implement it as a new PS system that enables ML algorithms to reach their solution more quickly.

6.6MLJun 18, 2014
Primitives for Dynamic Big Model Parallelism

Seunghak Lee, Jin Kyu Kim, Xun Zheng et al.

When training large machine learning models with many variables or parameters, a single machine is often inadequate since the model may be too large to fit in memory, while training can take a long time even with stochastic updates. A natural recourse is to turn to distributed cluster computing, in order to harness additional memory and processors. However, naive, unstructured parallelization of ML algorithms can make inefficient use of distributed memory, while failing to obtain proportional convergence speedups - or can even result in divergence. We develop a framework of primitives for dynamic model-parallelism, STRADS, in order to explore partitioning and update scheduling of model variables in distributed ML algorithms - thus improving their memory efficiency while presenting new opportunities to speed up convergence without compromising inference correctness. We demonstrate the efficacy of model-parallel algorithms implemented in STRADS versus popular implementations for Topic Modeling, Matrix Factorization and Lasso.

1.4MLDec 19, 2013
Structure-Aware Dynamic Scheduler for Parallel Machine Learning

Seunghak Lee, Jin Kyu Kim, Qirong Ho et al.

Training large machine learning (ML) models with many variables or parameters can take a long time if one employs sequential procedures even with stochastic updates. A natural solution is to turn to distributed computing on a cluster; however, naive, unstructured parallelization of ML algorithms does not usually lead to a proportional speedup and can even result in divergence, because dependencies between model elements can attenuate the computational gains from parallelization and compromise correctness of inference. Recent efforts toward this issue have benefited from exploiting the static, a priori block structures residing in ML algorithms. In this paper, we take this path further by exploring the dynamic block structures and workloads therein present during ML program execution, which offers new opportunities for improving convergence, correctness, and load balancing in distributed ML. We propose and showcase a general-purpose scheduler, STRADS, for coordinating distributed updates in ML algorithms, which harnesses the aforementioned opportunities in a systematic way. We provide theoretical guarantees for our scheduler, and demonstrate its efficacy versus static block structures on Lasso and Matrix Factorization.