Thomas Nedelec

ML
4papers
299citations
Novelty44%
AI Score24

4 Papers

LGOct 9, 2018
Bridging the gap between regret minimization and best arm identification, with application to A/B tests

Rémy Degenne, Thomas Nedelec, Clément Calauzènes et al.

State of the art online learning procedures focus either on selecting the best alternative ("best arm identification") or on minimizing the cost (the "regret"). We merge these two objectives by providing the theoretical analysis of cost minimizing algorithms that are also delta-PAC (with a proven guaranteed bound on the decision time), hence fulfilling at the same time regret minimization and best arm identification. This analysis sheds light on the common observation that ill-callibrated UCB-algorithms minimize regret while still identifying quickly the best arm. We also extend these results to the non-iid case faced by many practitioners. This provides a technique to make cost versus decision time compromise when doing adaptive tests with applications ranging from website A/B testing to clinical trials.

MLJan 22, 2018
Offline A/B testing for Recommender Systems

Alexandre Gilotte, Clément Calauzènes, Thomas Nedelec et al.

Before A/B testing online a new version of a recommender system, it is usual to perform some offline evaluations on historical data. We focus on evaluation methods that compute an estimator of the potential uplift in revenue that could generate this new technology. It helps to iterate faster and to avoid losing money by detecting poor policies. These estimators are known as counterfactual or off-policy estimators. We show that traditional counterfactual estimators such as capped importance sampling and normalised importance sampling are experimentally not having satisfying bias-variance compromises in the context of personalised product recommendation for online advertising. We propose two variants of counterfactual estimates with different modelling of the bias that prove to be accurate in real-world conditions. We provide a benchmark of these estimators by showing their correlation with business metrics observed by running online A/B tests on a commercial recommender system.

IRJun 23, 2017
Specializing Joint Representations for the task of Product Recommendation

Thomas Nedelec, Elena Smirnova, Flavian Vasile

We propose a unified product embedded representation that is optimized for the task of retrieval-based product recommendation. To this end, we introduce a new way to fuse modality-specific product embeddings into a joint product embedding, in order to leverage both product content information, such as textual descriptions and images, and product collaborative filtering signal. By introducing the fusion step at the very end of our architecture, we are able to train each modality separately, allowing us to keep a modular architecture that is preferable in real-world recommendation deployments. We analyze our performance on normal and hard recommendation setups such as cold-start and cross-category recommendations and achieve good performance on a large product shopping dataset.

MLApr 3, 2017
A comparative study of counterfactual estimators

Thomas Nedelec, Nicolas Le Roux, Vianney Perchet

We provide a comparative study of several widely used off-policy estimators (Empirical Average, Basic Importance Sampling and Normalized Importance Sampling), detailing the different regimes where they are individually suboptimal. We then exhibit properties optimal estimators should possess. In the case where examples have been gathered using multiple policies, we show that fused estimators dominate basic ones but can still be improved.