Nancy Lynch

Emily Toomey, Ken Segall, Matteo Castellani et al.

As the limits of traditional von Neumann computing come into view, the brain's ability to communicate vast quantities of information using low-power spikes has become an increasing source of inspiration for alternative architectures. Key to the success of these largescale neural networks is a power-efficient spiking element that is scalable and easily interfaced with traditional control electronics. In this work, we present a spiking element fabricated from superconducting nanowires that has pulse energies on the order of ~10 aJ. We demonstrate that the device reproduces essential characteristics of biological neurons, such as a refractory period and a firing threshold. Through simulations using experimentally measured device parameters, we show how nanowire-based networks may be used for inference in image recognition, and that the probabilistic nature of nanowire switching may be exploited for modeling biological processes and for applications that rely on stochasticity.

Nancy Lynch, Frederik Mallmann-Trenn

We study the question of how concepts that have structure get represented in the brain. Specifically, we introduce a model for hierarchically structured concepts and we show how a biologically plausible neural network can recognize these concepts, and how it can learn them in the first place. Our main goal is to introduce a general framework for these tasks and prove formally how both (recognition and learning) can be achieved. We show that both tasks can be accomplished even in presence of noise. For learning, we analyze Oja's rule formally, a well-known biologically-plausible rule for adjusting the weights of synapses. We complement the learning results with lower bounds asserting that, in order to recognize concepts of a certain hierarchical depth, neural networks must have a corresponding number of layers.

Nancy Lynch, Cameron Musco, Merav Parter

In this work we study biological neural networks from an algorithmic perspective, focusing on understanding tradeoffs between computation time and network complexity. Our goal is to abstract real neural networks in a way that, while not capturing all interesting features, preserves high-level behavior and allows us to make biologically relevant conclusions. Towards this goal, we consider the implementation of algorithmic primitives in a simple yet biologically plausible model of $stochastic\ spiking\ neural\ networks$. In particular, we show how the stochastic behavior of neurons in this model can be leveraged to solve a basic $symmetry-breaking\ task$ in which we are given neurons with identical firing rates and want to select a distinguished one. In computational neuroscience, this is known as the winner-take-all (WTA) problem, and it is believed to serve as a basic building block in many tasks, e.g., learning, pattern recognition, and clustering. We provide efficient constructions of WTA circuits in our stochastic spiking neural network model, as well as lower bounds in terms of the number of auxiliary neurons required to drive convergence to WTA in a given number of steps. These lower bounds demonstrate that our constructions are near-optimal in some cases. This work covers and gives more in-depth proofs of a subset of results originally published in [LMP17a]. It is adapted from the last chapter of C. Musco's Ph.D. thesis [Mus18].

Nancy Lynch, Mien Brabeeba Wang

In this paper, we consider networks of deterministic spiking neurons, firing synchronously at discrete times; such spiking neural networks are inspired by networks of neurons and synapses that occur in brains. We consider the problem of translating temporal information into spatial information in such networks, an important task that is carried out by actual brains. Specifically, we define two problems: "First Consecutive Spikes Counting (FCSC)" and "Total Spikes Counting (TSC)", which model spike and rate coding aspects of translating temporal information into spatial information respectively. Assuming an upper bound of $T$ on the length of the temporal input signal, we design two networks that solve these two problems, each using $O(\log T)$ neurons and terminating in time $1$. We also prove that there is no network with less than $T$ neurons that solves either question in time $0$.

Nancy Lynch, Cameron Musco

We present a formal, mathematical foundation for modeling and reasoning about the behavior of $synchronous$, $stochastic$ $Spiking$ $Neural$ $Networks$ $(SNNs)$, which have been widely used in studies of neural computation. Our approach follows paradigms established in the field of concurrency theory. Our SNN model is based on directed graphs of neurons, classified as input, output, and internal neurons. We focus here on basic SNNs, in which a neuron's only state is a Boolean value indicating whether or not the neuron is currently firing. We also define the $external$ $behavior$ of an SNN, in terms of probability distributions on its external firing patterns. We define two operators on SNNs: a $composition$ $operator$, which supports modeling of SNNs as combinations of smaller SNNs, and a $hiding$ $operator$, which reclassifies some output behavior of an SNN as internal. We prove results showing how the external behavior of a network built using these operators is related to the external behavior of its component networks. Finally, we define the notion of a $problem$ to be solved by an SNN, and show how the composition and hiding operators affect the problems that are solved by the networks. We illustrate our definitions with three examples: a Boolean circuit constructed from gates, an $Attention$ network constructed from a $Winner$-$Take$-$All$ network and a $Filter$ network, and a toy example involving combining two networks in a cyclic fashion.

Lili Su, Martin Zubeldia, Nancy Lynch

We consider multi-armed bandit problems in social groups wherein each individual has bounded memory and shares the common goal of learning the best arm/option. We say an individual learns the best option if eventually (as $t \to \infty$) it pulls only the arm with the highest average reward. While this goal is provably impossible for an isolated individual, we show that, in social groups, this goal can be achieved easily with the aid of social persuasion, i.e., communication. Specifically, we study the learning dynamics wherein an individual sequentially decides on which arm to pull next based on not only its private reward feedback but also the suggestions provided by randomly chosen peers. Our learning dynamics are hard to analyze via explicit probabilistic calculations due to the stochastic dependency induced by social interaction. Instead, we employ the mean-field approximation method from statistical physics and we show: (1) With probability $\to 1$ as the social group size $N \to \infty $, every individual in the social group learns the best option. (2) Over an arbitrary finite time horizon $[0, T]$, with high probability (in $N$), the fraction of individuals that prefer the best option grows to 1 exponentially fast as $t$ increases ($t\in [0, T]$). A major innovation of our mean-filed analysis is a simple yet powerful technique to deal with absorbing states in the interchange of limits $N \to \infty$ and $t \to \infty $. The mean-field approximation method allows us to approximate the probabilistic sample paths of our learning dynamics by a deterministic and smooth trajectory that corresponds to the unique solution of a well-behaved system of ordinary differential equations (ODEs). Such an approximation is desired because the analysis of a system of ODEs is relatively easier than that of the original stochastic system.

Nancy Lynch, Cameron Musco, Merav Parter

We study distributed algorithms implemented in a simplified biologically inspired model for stochastic spiking neural networks. We focus on tradeoffs between computation time and network complexity, along with the role of randomness in efficient neural computation. It is widely accepted that neural computation is inherently stochastic. In recent work, we explored how this stochasticity could be leveraged to solve the `winner-take-all' leader election task. Here, we focus on using randomness in neural algorithms for similarity testing and compression. In the most basic setting, given two $n$-length patterns of firing neurons, we wish to distinguish if the patterns are equal or $ε$-far from equal. Randomization allows us to solve this task with a very compact network, using $O \left (\frac{\sqrt{n}\log n}ε\right)$ auxiliary neurons, which is sublinear in the input size. At the heart of our solution is the design of a $t$-round neural random access memory, or indexing network, which we call a neuro-RAM. This module can be implemented with $O(n/t)$ auxiliary neurons and is useful in many applications beyond similarity testing. Using a VC dimension-based argument, we show that the tradeoff between runtime and network size in our neuro-RAM is nearly optimal. Our result has several implications -- since our neuro-RAM can be implemented with deterministic threshold gates, it shows that, in contrast to similarity testing, randomness does not provide significant computational advantages for this problem. It also establishes a separation between feedforward networks whose gates spike with sigmoidal probability functions, and well-studied deterministic sigmoidal networks, whose gates output real number sigmoidal values, and which can implement a neuro-RAM much more efficiently.

Nancy Lynch, Cameron Musco, Merav Parter

We initiate a line of investigation into biological neural networks from an algorithmic perspective. We develop a simplified but biologically plausible model for distributed computation in stochastic spiking neural networks and study tradeoffs between computation time and network complexity in this model. Our aim is to abstract real neural networks in a way that, while not capturing all interesting features, preserves high-level behavior and allows us to make biologically relevant conclusions. In this paper, we focus on the important `winner-take-all' (WTA) problem, which is analogous to a neural leader election unit: a network consisting of $n$ input neurons and $n$ corresponding output neurons must converge to a state in which a single output corresponding to a firing input (the `winner') fires, while all other outputs remain silent. Neural circuits for WTA rely on inhibitory neurons, which suppress the activity of competing outputs and drive the network towards a converged state with a single firing winner. We attempt to understand how the number of inhibitors used affects network convergence time. We show that it is possible to significantly outperform naive WTA constructions through a more refined use of inhibition, solving the problem in $O(θ)$ rounds in expectation with just $O(\log^{1/θ} n)$ inhibitors for any $θ$. An alternative construction gives convergence in $O(\log^{1/θ} n)$ rounds with $O(θ)$ inhibitors. We compliment these upper bounds with our main technical contribution, a nearly matching lower bound for networks using $\ge \log\log n$ inhibitors. Our lower bound uses familiar indistinguishability and locality arguments from distributed computing theory. It lets us derive a number of interesting conclusions about the structure of any network solving WTA with good probability, and the use of randomness and inhibition within such a network.