Simon Bliudze

Anton B. Ivanov, Simon Bliudze

Satellites and other complex systems now become more and more software dependent. Even nanosatellites have complexity that can be compared to scientific instruments launched to Mars. COTS components and subsystems may now be purchased to support payload development. On the contrary, the software has to be adapted to the new payload and, consequently, hardware architecture selected for the satellite. There is not a rigorous and robust way to design software for CubeSats or small satellites yet. In this paper, we will briefly review some existing systems and present our approach, which based on Behaviour-Interaction-Priority (BIP) framework. We will describe our experience in implementing fight software simulation and testing in the Swiss CubETH CubeSat project. We will conclude with lessons learned and future utilization of BIP for hardware testing and simulation.

Simon Bliudze, Saddek Bensalem

This volume contains the proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Methods and Tools for Rigorous System Design (MeTRiD 2018), held on the 15th of April, 2018 in Thessaloniki, Greece as part of ETAPS 2018, the European Joint Conferences on Theory and Practice of Software. The term "Rigorous System Design" (RSD) denotes the design approach that is based on a formal, accountable and iterative process for deriving trustworthy and optimised implementations from models of application software, its execution platform and its external environment. Ideally, a system implementation is derived from a set of appropriate high-level models by applying a sequence of semantics-preserving transformations. The ambition of MeTRiD is to promote the use of formal methods, in general, and the RSD approach, in particular, in the industrial applications and, reciprocally, bring the attention of the formal methods researchers to such industrial applications in order to develop realistic case-studies and guide the evolution of tools. Striving towards this ambitious goal, we have solicited contributions of three types: - regular papers, presenting original research - case study papers, reporting the evaluation of existing modelling, analysis, transformation and code generation formalisms and tools on realistic examples of significant size - tool papers, describing new tool prototypes supporting the RSD flow and enhancements of existing ones We have received 13 submissions (7 regular, 4 tool and 2 case study papers), whereof 8 have been accepted for presentation at the workshop: - 5 regular papers - 2 tool papers - 1 case study paper In this volume, these papers are complemented by an invited paper by Joseph Sifakis.

Anastasia Mavridou, Valentin Rutz, Simon Bliudze

JavaBIP allows the coordination of software components by clearly separating the functional and coordination aspects of the system behavior. JavaBIP implements the principles of the BIP component framework rooted in rigorous operational semantics. Recent work both on BIP and JavaBIP allows the coordination of static components defined prior to system deployment, i.e., the architecture of the coordinated system is fixed in terms of its component instances. Nevertheless, modern systems, often make use of components that can register and deregister dynamically during system execution. In this paper, we present an extension of JavaBIP that can handle this type of dynamicity. We use first-order interaction logic to define synchronization constraints based on component types. Additionally, we use directed graphs with edge coloring to model dependencies among components that determine the validity of an online system. We present the software architecture of our implementation, provide and discuss performance evaluation results.

Anastasia Mavridou, Eduard Baranov, Simon Bliudze et al.

Architecture styles characterise families of architectures sharing common characteristics. We have recently proposed configuration logics for architecture style specification. In this paper, we study a graphical notation to enhance readability and easiness of expression. We study simple architecture diagrams and a more expressive extension, interval architecture diagrams. For each type of diagrams, we present its semantics, a set of necessary and sufficient consistency conditions and a method that allows to characterise compositionally the specified architectures. We provide several examples illustrating the application of the results. We also present a polynomial-time algorithm for checking that a given architecture conforms to the architecture style specified by a diagram.

Eduard Baranov, Simon Bliudze

We extend our previous algebraic formalisation of the notion of component-based framework in order to formally define two forms, strong and weak, of the notion of full expressiveness. Our earlier result shows that the BIP (Behaviour-Interaction-Priority) framework does not possess the strong full expressiveness. In this paper, we show that BIP has the weak form of this notion and provide results detailing weak and strong full expressiveness for classical BIP and several modifications, obtained by relaxing the constraints imposed on priority models.

Eduard Baranov, Simon Bliudze

Based on a variation of the BIP operational semantics using the offer predicate introduced in our previous work, we extend the algebras used to model glue operators in BIP to encompass priorities. This extension uses the Algebra of Causal Interaction Trees, T(P), as a pivot: existing transformations automatically provide the extensions for the Algebra of Connectors. We then extend the axiomatisation of T(P), since the equivalence induced by the new operational semantics is weaker than that induced by the interaction semantics. This extension leads to canonical normal forms for all structures and to a simplification of the algorithm for the synthesis of connectors from Boolean coordination constraints.